*
https://tinyurl.com/ydf9n4qt
*
EVALUATION OF SOURCES :
EDUCATION: COLLEGE:
UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH :
TEMPLE UNIVERSITY :
PRIZES AND AWARDS:
Temple Undergraduate Research Prize AND
EVALUATION OF SOURCES:
SELECTED PUBLICATIONS AND DATABASE SEARCH RESULTS
*
*
Temple University and Temple University Libraries Undergraduate Research Programs, Prizes and Internships
EDUCATION: COLLEGE: UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH :
TEMPLE UNIVERSITY :
PRIZES AND AWARDS:
Temple Undergraduate Research Prize Winners
Livingstone Undergraduate Research Awards
Links to Full Text of Papers at this Web Address:
http://digital.library.temple.edu/cdm/search/collection/p15037coll12
Database Search Results for the Livingstone Prize
https://tinyurl.com/yan5ekfw
*
About this Website
http://digital.library.temple.edu/cdm/landingpage/collection/p15037coll12
*
Database Search Results for “Temple Undergraduate Research”
Google Web Search
https://tinyurl.com/yb72ndyu
https://tinyurl.com/y8kozu6d
*
Google Scholar
https://tinyurl.com/y8ayb7oq
*
Google Books
https://tinyurl.com/y7cspwb4
*
Google Images
For the best results for the top link, click on each image and then on the resulting box click on VIEW
https://tinyurl.com/y86lhzju
https://tinyurl.com/y7cgkpof
https://tinyurl.com/y9plh3cw
*
Google Domain Limited Web Search (NEWS)
https://tinyurl.com/yb97na9z
https://tinyurl.com/y9w35evp
*
Google Domain Limited Web Search (MAGAZINE / MAGAZINES)
https://tinyurl.com/yc63tu7w
https://tinyurl.com/ydhrk9fz
*
YouTube and Google Videos
https://tinyurl.com/y8n664og
https://tinyurl.com/y6vxkatn
https://tinyurl.com/yajwggyp
https://tinyurl.com/yakg9spb
https://tinyurl.com/y9nydswd
https://tinyurl.com/ycc9yjs6
*
“TEMPLE UNIVERSITY UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH” DOCUMENTATION FROM DATABASE SEARCH RESULTS : UNIVERSITY SITE SEARCH ENGINE
https://search.temple.edu/search.php?searchString=%22Undergraduate+Research%22+
CONTENT SAMPLE
About 3080 results (0.4 seconds)
https://cst.temple.edu/research/undergraduate-research
The Undergraduate Research Program offers CST students an opportunity to work directly with world-class researchers on real-world research.
Completing hands-on independent research is critical to the next step in a student’s educational or professional career. Read the URP FAQ to learn more. To participate in URP, …
http://guides.temple.edu/livingstone
6 days ago … The Livingstone Undergraduate Research Awards are prizes of up to $1000, awarded for the best research project(s) in each of the following categories:
Livingstone Undergraduate Research Award in the Humanities; Livingstone Undergraduate Research Award in the Social Sciences; Livingstone …
https://cst.temple.edu/research/research-and-internships
CST Undergraduate Research Program (URP) This program offers students an opportunity to work directly with world-class researchers on real-world research. Creative Arts,
Research, snd Scholarship (CARAS) Program Temple funding to encourage and support undergraduate and professional students engaged in …
https://chem.cst.temple.edu/undergraduate-research.html
Credits for independent research with a faculty member are available through the Chemistry Department’s research courses. These courses can count towards one of the advanced
laboratory requirements for the major. To register for credit for independent research, complete the Undergraduate Research in Chemistry …
https://cst.temple.edu/research/undergraduate-research-program/apply
Students who are taking only a 1 or 2 credit hour research course are no longer eligible for additional hours of pay. Spring 2018 Application-
All Applications MUST be complete by midnight on 11/8/2017. NOTE: Students can also do undergraduate research outside of this program and still receive course credit. Please …
http://www.temple.edu/vpus/fellowships/undergrad-opportunities/research-teaching-experiences.html
The Temple University Diamond Research and Teaching Programs, Creative Arts, Research and Scholarship (CARAS) grants, and the CST Undergraduate Research Program
are all paid opportunities to have these experiences. So use the links below to explore your field, develop marketable skills and knowledge, and …
http://www.temple.edu/vpus/opportunities/ResearchScholars.htm
The Diamond Research Scholars Program provides Temple undergraduates the opportunity to engage in a focused, mentored research or creative arts project during the summer and fall.
The program requires that students participate in the all-day Undergraduate Research Institute, devote ten weeks during the summer to …
http://www.temple.edu/vpus/opportunities/TURF.htm
Temple Undergraduate Research Forum and Creative Works Symposium. The Temple Undergraduate Research Forum –
Creative Works Symposium (TURF- CreWS) provides ambitious, intellectually motivated undergraduate students the opportunity to present and defend their original research or creative work among …
http://www.temple.edu/vpus/opportunities/CARAS.htm
Community-Based Learning · Learning Communities & University Seminars · Peer Teacher Program · Scholarships · Temple Law Scholars ·
Undergraduate Research & Creativity. Archives. CARAS Fall 2010 · CARAS Spring 2011 …
https://cst.temple.edu/giving/URP
Talented students working with world-class researchers. At CST, real-world research projects are an essential part of the curriculum.
Introduced in 2009, the Undergraduate Research Program’s goals were straightforward: Get talented and motivated students into the laboratory with world-class Temple researchers and …
About 13200 results (0.4 seconds)
http://www.temple.edu/vpus/fellowships/undergrad-opportunities/researchopportunitiesexternaltotemple.htm
American Chemical Society Guide to Undergraduate Research Website: click here. Web resource listing summer research internships.
Committee on Institutional Cooperation Summer Research Opportunities Program (SROPs) Website: http://www.cic.net/students/srop/home.
The Summer Research Opportunities Program …
https://cst.temple.edu/research/undergraduate-research-program/questions
As part of its effort to encourage undergraduate participation in scientific research ,
the College of Science and Technology created the CST Undergraduate Research Program (URP).This program allows students
in the College of Science and Technology to work with distinguished Temple faculty members on both the Main …
https://cst.temple.edu/research/summer-2018-research-opportunities
VIEW DETAILED NEWSLETTER. From January 12th Summer Research Newsletter:
Deadlines in early 2018 for Summer 2018 Undergraduate Research Opps. Okeanos Explorer-In-Training Program; Medical College of Wisconsin Summer Programs;
Minority Health International Research Training Program; University of …
http://www.temple.edu/vpus/opportunities/index.htm
Temple Undergraduate Research Forum – Creative Works Symposium (TURF – CreWS). The Temple Undergraduate Research Forum –
Creative Works Symposium, held annually in the spring, provides undergraduates the opportunity to present their research to …
http://www.temple.edu/vpus/opportunities/TURFapp.htm
temple Undergraduate research forum-creative works symposium. Email a friend · Print this page. Horizontal Bar. TURF-CreWS; Application. Students.
TURF- CreWS Submission/Nomination Form. Application is now OPEN with a deadline of February 5. Fields marked with * are required. Enter all information accurately; this …
http://digital.library.temple.edu/cdm/landingpage/collection/p15037coll12
The Library Prize for Undergraduate Research was established in 2004 to encourage the use of Library resources, to enhance the development of library research techniques,
and to honor the best research projects produced each year by Temple University undergraduate students. Winning entries exhibited originality, …
https://cst.temple.edu/research
Research at the College of Science and Technology is moving forward in many ways, including hiring outstanding researchers, more than doubling the amount of sponsored research,
investing in advanced facilities and introducing the Undergraduate Research Program. Through its research centers and institutes CST is …
https://chem.cst.temple.edu/research.html
The department of Chemistry at Temple University has a number of research- active faculty, with interests that span all sub-disciplines of chemistry.
Get to know the research and facilities in the department by clicking on the links below. Picture · Faculty · Research Institutes · Facilities. TEMPLE UNIVERSITY · COLLEGE OF …
http://www.temple.edu/vpus/students/index.htm
Undergraduate Research & Creativity. Creative Arts, Research, And Scholarship (CARAS) Program. The Temple University Research Administration in collaboration
with the Office of the Provost and the Deans of Temple University’s Schools and Colleges is pleased to provide a funding opportunity to encourage and …
http://www.cla.temple.edu/cj/undergraduate/
… tailor their honors experience to include a criminal justice specialization. In addition to the honors-level elective courses offered, an invaluable part of the program
is the opportunity for students to develop an honors thesis based upon an undergraduate research project individually mentored by a criminal justice professor.
← Previous Page 2 Next →
TEMPLE UNIVERSITY LIBRARIES SITE SEARCH FOR “UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH”
https://library.temple.edu/search/google/%22Undergraduate%20Research%22
CONTENT SAMPLE
==========================================================
Selected Books
Successful Strategies for Teaching Undergraduate Research
Editors Marta Deyrup, Beth Bloom
Publisher Scarecrow Press, 2013
ISBN 0810887177, 9780810887176
Length 204 pages
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Undergraduates and library research: what’s changed, what hasn’t, what now? /
Mary W. George —
The State of Teaching Today. Research questions and the research question:
what are we teaching when we teach research? /
Heidi L.M. Jacobs —
Understanding the relationship between good research and good writing /
Barbara J. D’Angelo —
Toward the “good” research assignment: a librarian speaks /
Roberta Tipton —
Toward the “good” research assignment: an academic speaks /
Willilamjames Hull Hoffer —
Teaching new media as a form of writing: explorations in evolving genres /
James Elmborg —
From punitive policing to proactive prevention: approaches to teaching information
ethics in the college classroom / Maria T. Accardi —
Assessing the information research process /
Stephanie Sterling Brasley. —
The Strategies in Action: Four Ideas That Work. Sources before search:
a scaffolded approach to teaching research /
Stephanie N. Otis —
RAIDS for research /
Sara D Miller, Nancy C. DeJoy, Benjamin M. Oberdock —
College students as Wikipedia editors: new pathways to information literacy /
Davida Scharf —
Training the trainer: librarians as faculty coaches and workshop designers /
Beth Bloom.
http://tinyurl.com/hum6s9d
*
The Research Paper: A Guide to Library and Internet Research
Authors Dawn Rodrigues, Raymond J. Rodrigues
Edition 3, illustrated
Publisher Prentice Hall, 2003
ISBN 0130982563, 9780130982568
Length 259 pages
http://tinyurl.com/zgmuhmw
*
Research Papers
Authors William Coyle, Joe Law
Edition 16
Publisher Cengage Learning, 2013
ISBN 1133713017, 9781133713012
Length 272 pages
http://tinyurl.com/jna6x9q
*
Building Better Essays
Cengage Advantage Books
New 1st Editions in Developmental English Series
Author Gina Hogan
Publisher Cengage Learning, 2012
ISBN 0495905178, 9780495905172
Length 272 pages
http://tinyurl.com/hrlzco6
*
Quality Research Papers:
For Students of Religion and Theology
Authors
Nancy Jean Vyhmeister, Terry Dwain Robertson
Publisher Harper Collins, 2014
ISBN 0310514037, 9780310514039
Length 304 pages
http://tinyurl.com/ztnndf4
*
Real Essays with Readings:
Writing for Success in College, Work, and Everyday Life
Author Susan Anker
Publisher Macmillan, 2011
ISBN 0312648081, 9780312648084
Length 912 pages
http://tinyurl.com/jt7rjh7
*
Research Paper Handbook: Your Complete Guide
Research Paper Handbook Series
Author James D. Lester
Publisher Good Year Books, 2005
ISBN 1596470763, 9781596470767
Length 232 pages
http://tinyurl.com/hyhgj3k
*
Writing the Research Paper: A Handbook
Authors Anthony Winkler, Jo Ray McCuen-Metherell
Edition 7, illustrated
Publisher Cengage Learning, 2007
ISBN 1413011713, 9781413011715
Length 360 pages
http://tinyurl.com/jch3osm
*
Writing the Research Paper: A Handbook
Authors
Anthony C. Winkler, Jo Ray McCuen-Metherell
Edition 8
Publisher Cengage Learning, 2011
ISBN 1133169023, 9781133169024
Length 360 pages
http://tinyurl.com/jch3osm
*
Principles of Writing Research Papers
Penguin academics
Author James D. Lester
Edition 2, illustrated
Publisher Penguin Academics, 2007
Original from the University of Virginia
Digitized Nov 24, 2009
ISBN 032142610X, 9780321426109
Length 266 pages
http://tinyurl.com/jhyqweg
*
Writing, Reading, and Research
Authors Richard Veit, Christopher Gould
Edition 8, illustrated
Publisher Cengage Learning, 2009
ISBN 0547191049, 9780547191041
Length 640 pages
http://tinyurl.com/zh67dxw
*
The Johns Hopkins Guide to Digital Media
UPCC book collections on Project MUSE
Author Marie-Laure Ryan
Editors Marie-Laure Ryan, Lori Emerson, Benjamin J. Robertson
Edition illustrated
Publisher JHU Press, 2013
ISBN 142141225X, 9781421412252
Length 553 pages
http://tinyurl.com/jnldz3s
*
MLA Handbook for Writers of Research Papers
Authors
Joseph Gibaldi,
Modern Language Association of America
Edition 4, illustrated, reprint
Publisher
Modern Language Association of America, 1995
ISBN 0873525655, 9780873525657
Length 293 pages
http://tinyurl.com/gp3lytu
*
A Manual for Writers of Research Papers, Theses, and Dissertations,
Seventh Edition:
Chicago Style for Students and Researchers
Chicago Guides to Writing, Editing, and
Author Kate L. Turabian
Contributors Wayne C. Booth, Gregory G. Colomb,
Joseph M. Williams, Wayne C. University of Chicago Press Staff
Edition revised
Publisher University of Chicago Press, 2009
ISBN 0226823385, 9780226823386
Length 436 pages
http://tinyurl.com/hxvjaoo
http://tinyurl.com/zz8sl3t
*
The Sundance Writer:
A Rhetoric, Reader, and Research Guide, Brief
Author Mark Connelly
Edition 5
Publisher Cengage Learning, 2012
ISBN 113371370X, 9781133713708
Length 752 pages
http://tinyurl.com/zcpqnun
*
The Wadsworth Handbook
Authors Laurie G. Kirszner, Stephen R. Mandell
Edition 10
Publisher Cengage Learning, 2013
ISBN 1285500121, 9781285500126
Length 864 pages
http://tinyurl.com/j3ngfsl
*
Usability of Complex Information Systems:
Evaluation of User Interaction
Editors Michael Albers, Brian Still
Edition illustrated
Publisher CRC Press, 2010
ISBN 1439828954, 9781439828953
Length 399 pages
http://tinyurl.com/j9m325y
*
Fusion: Integrated Reading and Writing, Book 2
Authors
Dave Kemper, Verne Meyer, John Van Rys, Patrick Sebranek
Edition 2
Publisher Cengage Learning, 2015
ISBN 1305537947, 9781305537941
Length 656 pages
http://tinyurl.com/hfvtqep
*
Quick Access: Essays and Term Papers
Quick Access
Author Research and Education Association
Publisher Research & Education Assoc., 2009
ISBN 0738607282, 9780738607283
Length 4 pages
*
A Guide to MLA Documentation
Author Joseph F. Trimmer
Edition 9, illustrated, annotated
Publisher Cengage Learning, 2012
ISBN 1111837074, 9781111837075
Length 48 pages
http://tinyurl.com/glqhw3a
*
Insightful Writing: A Process Rhetoric with Readings
Authors David Sabrio, Mitchell Burchfield
Edition illustrated
Publisher Cengage Learning, 2008
ISBN 0618870261, 9780618870264
Length 336 pages
http://tinyurl.com/jt2tg5p
*
The Chicago Manual of Style
Author University of Chicago. Press
Contributor University of Chicago
Publisher University of Chicago Press, 2003
ISBN 0226104036, 9780226104034
http://tinyurl.com/grkff5r
*
The Curious Researcher:
A Guide to Writing Research Papers
Author Bruce Ballenger
Edition 7, illustrated
Publisher Pearson Education, 2011
ISBN 0205172873, 9780205172870
Length 348 pages
http://tinyurl.com/zohp3eo
*
Writing Research Papers Across the Curriculum
Advantage (Thomson)
Advantage series
Author Susan M. Hubbuch
Edition 5, illustrated
Publisher Thomson Wadsworth, 2004
ISBN 1413002374, 9781413002379
Length 450 pages
http://tinyurl.com/z9pxmul
*
Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Paper: Evaluating Sources
University of Southern California Libraries
http://libguides.usc.edu/c.php?g=235034&p=1561749
*
Purpose of Guide
Types of Research Designs
- Choosing a Research Problem
- Preparing to Write
- The Abstract
- The Introduction
- The Literature Review
- The Methodology
- The Results
Using Non-Textual Elements
- The Discussion
- The Conclusion
- Proofreading Your Paper
- Citing Sources
Annotated Bibliography
Giving an Oral Presentation
Grading Someone Else’s Paper
How to Manage Group Projects
Writing a Book Review
Writing a Case Study
Writing a Field Report
Writing a Policy Memo
Writing a Research Proposa
http://libguides.usc.edu/c.php?g=235034&p=1561749
.
.
.
How to Write a Research Paper
http://guides.temple.edu/research-papers
*
How to Write an Annotated Bibliography
http://guides.temple.edu/annotated-bibliographies
*
How to Find and Write Book Reviews:
Databases and Search Engine Searches for Finding Book Reviews
http://guides.temple.edu/bkrev
*
Digital Humanities and Digital Initiatives Sources
http://guides.temple.edu/digital-humanities
*
DISSERTATIONS: Finding and Writing Dissertations and Theses
http://guides.temple.edu/dissertations
*
Faculty Credentialing
http://guides.temple.edu/FacultyCredentialing
*
GOVERNMENT PUBLICATION MANUALS :
Government Writing Manuals Guides and Handbooks
http://guides.temple.edu/GovWritingManuals
*
Grey Literature Sources and Tools
http://guides.temple.edu/grey-literature
*
INFORMATION LITERACY AND FRIENDS
http://tinyurl.com/78a4shn
*
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT GUIDE SERIES:
COPYRIGHT, Intellectual Property and Plagiarism Sources
http://guides.temple.edu/copyright-plagiarism
*
Fair Use Under Copyright Law:
Fair Use Books, Websites and Database Search Results
http://guides.temple.edu/fair-use
*
JOURNAL CITATION RANKING SUBJECT LISTS FEATURING SCIMAGO:
Citation Analysis, Journal Rankings and Rankings Within Disciplines
and Faculty Assessment and Credentialing
http://guides.temple.edu/journal-citation-ranking
*
How to Create a Literature Review
http://guides.temple.edu/literature-review
*
Media Literacy and News Literacy
http://guides.temple.edu/medialit
*
How to Create a Meta-Analysis and a Systematic Review
http://guides.temple.edu/Meta-Analysis
*
NEWS: Newspapers News and News Archive Resources
http://guides.temple.edu/news
*
Plain English Writing Books and Database Search Results
http://guides.temple.edu/plain-english
*
REFWORKS
http://guides.temple.edu/ref-works
*
STATISTICS:
Databases, Sources and Database Search Results
for Statisitical Data Compilations and Publications
Including an Extensive Section of United States
Government Agencies with Database Search Results
from Nineteen Database Search Links for Each Agency
*
http://guides.temple.edu/statistics-sources
*
Research Guide Directory : Discussion Group Directory
https://sites.google.com/site/researchguidesonsites/
*
*
[PDF] Evaluating Sources of Information
PK Hurley – Online Text and Course Materials – Citeseer
http://tinyurl.com/gvt7qfy
*
Articles
Writing Centers and Libraries: One-Stop Shopping for Better Term Papers
DOI:10.1080/02763870802101310
Rachel Cookea* & Carol Bledsoeb
pages 119-127
Published online: 12 Dec 2008
The Reference Librarian
Volume 49, Issue 2, 2008
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02763870802101310
http://tinyurl.com/zvakyqj
*
MacDonald, A. B.
(2010).
Multiple Visions of the Research Paper:
How Compositionists and Librarians Understand, Represent, and Teach
the Research Process
(Doctoral dissertation, Auburn University).
https://etd.auburn.edu/handle/10415/2072
*
Donahue, A. E., and Gamtso, C.
(2010).
Term papers, Google, and library anxiety:
how can information literacy improve students’ research skills?.
http://tinyurl.com/hxtbz99
*
*
DATABASE SEARCH RESULTS: Penn State Summon Search
http://tinyurl.com/ltnjzzv
2,767 results
http://tinyurl.com/ltnjzzv
(“term paper” OR “term papers” OR “research paper” OR “research papers”) AND (“source evaluation” OR “evaluating sources”)
.
.
Evaluating Sources: Overview
OWL Family of Sites > OWL > Research and Citation > Conducting Research >
Evaluating Sources of Information FROM PURDUE
https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/553/01/
Related OWL Content
· Suggested Resources
.
.
Evaluating Sources to Answer a Research Question
You will want your research paper to be respected and credible.
Therefore, after you identify sources relevant to your research,
you need to determine whether they can help answer your research question.
There are four questions to ask when evaluating sources:
- How well does the source answer the research question?
- Is the information provided by an expert?
- Is the source valid?
- Is there a variety of sources?
FROM Suny Empire State College
https://www.esc.edu/online-writing-center/resources/
research/research-paper-steps/evaluating-sources/
OR
http://tinyurl.com/jtcyx82
.
.
Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Paper:
Evaluating Sources
USC Libraries
http://libguides.usc.edu/writingguide/evaluatesources
.
Types of Research Designs
Toggle Dropdown
1. Choosing a Research Problem
Toggle Dropdown
2. Preparing to Write
Toggle Dropdown
3. The Abstract
Toggle Dropdown
4. The Introduction
Toggle Dropdown
5. The Literature Review
Toggle Dropdown
6. The Methodology
Toggle Dropdown
7. The Results
Toggle Dropdown
8. The Discussion
Toggle Dropdown
9. The Conclusion
Toggle Dropdown
10. Proofreading Your Paper
Toggle Dropdown
11. Citing Sources
Toggle Dropdown
Annotated Bibliography
Giving an Oral Presentation
Toggle Dropdown
Grading Someone Else’s Paper
How to Manage Group Projects
Toggle Dropdown
Writing a Book Review
Toggle Dropdown
Writing a Case Study
Writing a Field Report
Toggle Dropdown
Writing a Policy Memo
Writing a Research Proposal
Acknowledgements
.
.
Elements of a Research Proposal and Report
2005 © David S. Walonick, Ph.D.
The Research Proposal and Report
http://www.statpac.org/research-library/research-proposal.htm
.
.
How to Write the Methods Section of a Research Paper. – NCBI
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15447808
The methods section of a research paper provides
the information by which a study’s validity is judged.
Therefore, it requires a clear and precise description
of how an experiment was done, and the rationale for
why specific experimental procedures were chosen.
The methods section should describe what was done
to answer the research question, describe how it was
done, justify the experimental design, and explain how
the results were analyzed. Scientific writing is direct
and orderly. Therefore, the methods section structure
should: describe the materials used in the study, explain
how the materials were prepared for the study, describe
the research protocol, explain how measurements were
made and what calculations were performed, and state
which statistical tests were done to analyze the data.
Once all elements of the methods section are written,
subsequent drafts should focus on how to present those
elements as clearly and logically as possibly.
The description of preparations, measurements, and the
protocol should be organized chronologically. For clarity,
when a large amount of detail must be presented, information
should be presented in sub-sections according to topic.
Material in each section should be organized by topic from
most to least important.
.
.
EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE
Amber Huett and David MacMillan
June 2011
UNA Center for Writing Excellence
Evidence Based Practice in nursing focuses on the idea that medical practices ought to be developed and adapted based on an ongoing cycle of evidence, theory, and research. As changes in practice prompt further research, the theories developed from that research serve as evidence to
produce more changes in practice. The implementation of Evidence Based Practice in nursing, also called Systematic Review, requires the review of such research with the intention of targeting and improving inadequate practice.
The systematic review of outside research attempts to make sense of the large body of information available in order to implement change effectively. The available research may be qualitative, quantitative, or evidence based. How can this research be applied on an individual basis to improve patient care?
Evidence Based Practice involves the following six steps:
Assess the need for change
Locate the best evidence
Synthesize evidence
Design the change
Implement and evaluate
Integrate and maintain changes
https://www.una.edu/writingcenter/docs/Writing-Resources/Evidence-Based%20Practice.pdf
OR
http://tinyurl.com/gn92mkb
.
.
McMillan, James H., and Sally Schumacher.
Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry.
Pearson Higher Ed, 2014.
http://tinyurl.com/zyf5ae8
.
Polit-O’Hara, Denise, and Cheryl Tatano Beck.
Essentials of nursing research:
Methods, appraisal, and utilization.
Vol. 1. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2006.
http://tinyurl.com/h69f4wk
.
Greenhalgh, Trisha.
How to read a paper:
The basics of evidence-based medicine.
John Wiley and Sons, 2014.
http://tinyurl.com/jocn4lw
.
Grinnell Jr, Richard M., and Yvonne A. Unrau.
Social work research and evaluation:
Foundations of evidence-based practice.
Oxford University Press, 2010.
http://tinyurl.com/jras32e
.
Sanderson, Ian.
“Is it ‘what works’ that matters?
Evaluation and evidence‐based policy‐making.”
Research papers in education 18, no. 4 (2003): 331-345.
http://tinyurl.com/hn94p2n
*
Author Coleman, Vernon
Title PAPER DOCTORS: A CRITICAL ASSESSMENT OF MEDICAL RESEARCH
Place London
Publisher Temple Smith
Year 1977
Pages 170
ISBN 0-85117-109-5
Language English
Publication Type Book, booklet
Subject Area Applied and Professional Ethics – Scientific Research; Human Experimentation – General
Keywords (TELS) Wissenschaftliches Fehlverhalten*; Wissenschaftsethik*; Humanexperiment
scientific misconduct*; ethics of science*; human experimentation
http://tinyurl.com/hhxszad
*
Author Selvan, Mano S; Subbian, Saravana; Cantor, Scott B; Rodriguez, Alma; Smith, Martin L; Walsh, Garrett L
Title Ethics of transparency in research reports.
Source Indian journal of medical ethics
Volume/Issue Vol. 8 (1)
Year 2011
Publication Date 2011-01
Pages 31-6
ISSN 0974-8466
Language English
Publication Type Article (journal article)
Subject Area Policy Guidelines / Institutional Review Boards / Review Committees; Social Control of Human Experimentation
Keywords (TELS) Humanexperiment*; Richtlinie*; Humanexperiment; Soziale Kontrolle
human experimentation*; guidelines*; human experimentation; social control
Keywords (MeSH) Cost-Benefit Analysis; Data Interpretation, Statistical; Drug Evaluation/ statistics & numerical data; Evidence-Based Medicine; Humans; Information Dissemination/ ethics*; Research Report*
Classification (BRL) 18.2*; 18.6
Abstract Transparency in research methods and results is now widely seen as an imperative if the healthcare and research enterprise is to be truly successful. A patient-centred focus in the conduct of clinical care includes its safety, effectiveness, efficiency, equity, and timeliness. Innovative ways are being developed to understand, disseminate, and rapidly apply the best evidence to care delivery. In this article, we demonstrate the use of simple and appropriate statistics in research reports that should help healthcare providers apply knowledge to practice by making it easier for them to understand clinical medicine.
http://tinyurl.com/jqxjk8b
*
Author Groves, T
Title What makes a high quality clinical research paper?
Source Oral diseases
Volume/Issue Vol. 16 (4)
Year 2010
Publication Date 2010-05
Pages 313-5
ISSN 1601-0825
Language English
Publication Type Article (journal article)
Subject Area Applied and Professional Ethics – Journalism / Mass Media; Policy Guidelines / Institutional Review Boards / Review Committees
Keywords (TELS) Publikationswesen*; Ethik*; Humanexperiment; Richtlinie
publishing*; ethics*; human experimentation; guidelines
Keywords (MeSH) Clinical Trials as Topic*; Ethics, Research*; Guidelines as Topic; Humans; Journalism, Medical/ standards*; Periodicals as Topic; Publishing/ standards*; Writing/ standards*
Classification (BRL) 1.3.7*; 18.2
Abstract The quality of a research paper depends primarily on the quality of the research study it reports. However, there is also much that authors can do to maximise the clarity and usefulness of their papers. Journals’ instructions for authors often focus on the format, style, and length of articles but do not always emphasise the need to clearly explain the work’s science and ethics: so this review reminds researchers that transparency is important too. The research question should be stated clearly, along with an explanation of where it came from and why it is important. The study methods must be reported fully and, where appropriate, in line with an evidence based reporting guideline such as the CONSORT statement for randomised controlled trials. If the study was a trial the paper should state where and when the study was registered and state its registration identifier. Finally, any relevant conflicts of interest should be declared.
http://tinyurl.com/z9jnfkv
*
EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE
Amber Huett and David MacMillan
June 2011
UNA Center for Writing Excellence
*
Evidence Based Practice in nursing focuses on the idea that medical practices ought to be developed and adapted based on an ongoing cycle of evidence, theory, and research. As changes in practice prompt further research, the theories developed from that research serve as evidence to
produce more changes in practice. The implementation of Evidence Based Practice in nursing, also called Systematic Review, requires the review of such research with the intention of targeting and improving inadequate practice.
The systematic review of outside research attempts to make sense of the large body of information available in order to implement change effectively. The available research may be qualitative, quantitative, or evidence based. How can this research be applied on an individual basis to improve patient care?
Evidence Based Practice involves the following six steps:
Assess the need for change
Locate the best evidence
Synthesize evidence
Design the change
Implement and evaluate
Integrate and maintain changes
https://www.una.edu/writingcenter/docs/Writing-Resources/Evidence-Based%20Practice.pdf
OR
http://tinyurl.com/gn92mkb
*
McMillan, James H., and Sally Schumacher.
Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry.
Pearson Higher Ed, 2014.
http://tinyurl.com/zyf5ae8
*
Polit-O’Hara, Denise, and Cheryl Tatano Beck.
Essentials of nursing research:
Methods, appraisal, and utilization.
Vol. 1. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2006.
http://tinyurl.com/h69f4wk
*
Greenhalgh, Trisha.
How to read a paper:
The basics of evidence-based medicine.
John Wiley and Sons, 2014.
http://tinyurl.com/jocn4lw
*
Grinnell Jr, Richard M., and Yvonne A. Unrau.
Social work research and evaluation:
Foundations of evidence-based practice.
Oxford University Press, 2010.
http://tinyurl.com/jras32e
*
Sanderson, Ian.
“Is it ‘what works’ that matters?
Evaluation and evidence‐based policy‐making.”
Research papers in education 18, no. 4 (2003): 331-345.
http://tinyurl.com/hn94p2n
*
*
==========================================
Database Search Results
for Source Evaluation for Research Reports
==========================================
*
*
Google Books
http://tinyurl.com/jorjbnc
*
Google Domain Limited Web Search (BLOGS)
http://tinyurl.com/z5y2fhd
========================================
Content Sample of SOURCES FOUND WITH
GOOGLE DOMAIN NAME WEB SEARCH (BLOGS)
========================================
*
Evid Based Nurs 2003;6:36-40 doi:10.1136/ebn.6.2.36
EBN users’ guide
Evaluation of qualitative research studies
http://ebn.bmj.com/content/6/2/36.fullCynthia K Russell, RN, ARNP, PhD1, David M Gregory, RN, PhD2
*
What’s Wrong with Wikipedia?
Harvard Guide to Using Sources
A Publication of the Harvard College Writing Program
Site Navigation
http://tinyurl.com/q3rvfhd
*
by Chelsea Lee
http://blog.apastyle.org/apastyle/research/
“Proper citation is an important component of any APA Style paper.
However, many readers believe certain sources aren’t allowed in
APA Style, and they write to us looking for a definitive list of what is
off limits. Two of the most common questions are about whether it’s
okay to cite websites and whether sources have to have been
published within a certain time frame to be cited, such as the last
5 or 10 years.”
Blog Post Contents
Reliable Sources
Primary Sources
Up-to-Date Sources
.
Additional Posts in this Group APA Blog Posts
April 02, 2015
by Timothy McAdoo
What are keywords?
.
February 04, 2015
by Timothy McAdoo
Note: To learn how to cite individual tweets or posts that include hashtags, see our post on citing social media. This post is about how to talk about the hashtags themselves.
.
October 21, 2014
.
May 09, 2014
.
October 24, 2013
by Jeff Hume-Pratuch
.
snip
*
EPC Evidence-Based Reports | Agency for Healthcare Research
http://www.ahrq.gov/research/findings/evidence-based-reports/index.html
This search provides complete titles of released evidence reports,
comparative effectiveness reviews, technical briefs, Technology
Assessment Program reports, and U.S. Preventive Services Task
Force evidence syntheses.
Under the Evidence-based Practice Centers (EPC) Program of
the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 5-year contracts
are awarded to institutions in the United States and Canada to
serve as EPCs. The EPCs review all relevant scientific literature on
a wide spectrum of clinical and health services topics to produce
various types of evidence reports. These reports may be used for
informing and developing coverage decisions, quality measures,
educational materials and tools, clinical practice guidelines, and
research agendas. The EPCs also conduct research on methodology
of evidence synthesis.
The following list provides contact information and Web sites
where available for the 13 Evidence-based Practice Centers
currently funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and
Quality.
The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) serves
as the science partner with private-sector and public organizations
in their efforts to improve the quality, effectiveness, and
appropriateness of health care delivery in the United States, and to
expedite the translation of evidence-based research findings into
improved health care services. In this context, AHRQ awards task
order contracts to its Evidence-based Practice Centers (EPCs) to
undertake scientific analysis and evidence syntheses on topics of
high priority to its stakeholders, which includes public and private
health care payers, providers, and the health care community in
general.
EPCs produce technical reports on systematic review methodological
topics and other types of evidence synthesis-related reports such as
reports summarizing future research needs for a given topic.
In addition, EPCs, the Scientific Resource Center, and other
AHRQ-funded entities have produced tools and software to aid
researchers.
Guide for partners in the Effective Health Care Program program.
Page last reviewed November 2016
Page originally created April 2013
Internet Citation: EPC Evidence-Based Reports. Content last reviewed
November 2016. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD.
http://www.ahrq.gov/research/findings/evidence-based-reports/index.html
*
Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying_reliable_sources
This page documents an English Wikipedia content guideline.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikipedia_content_guidelines
Contents
· 1 Overview
· 2 Some types of sources
· 3 Questionable and self-published sources
· 4 Reliability in specific contexts
· 5 See also
· 6 Notes
· 7 References
*
References for College Papers
Steven Dutch, Natural and Applied Sciences, University of Wisconsin – Green Bay
First – time Visitors: Please visit Site Map and Disclaimer.
https://www.uwgb.edu/dutchs/paperref.htm
“General Principles for References
- Use the most original source possible.
- Use the most up-to-date and reliable source available.
- Your paper is only as good as its weakest source.”
.
snip
.
The Following ARE Acceptable References
- Scholarly Periodicals
- Scholarly Books
- Reputable Translations of Foreign Works
- Student Theses
- Research Forums or Hotlines on the Internet
- Internet Periodicals by Reputable Organizations
Most of the information in academia does not flow through books! The real information flow is through periodicals. Even here, acceptability varies. Scientific American is acceptable for most college research papers, but not for a graduate thesis.
Scholarly books serve several purposes:
- They collect related articles on a subject from scattered sources.
- They contain specially-written articles contributed by various authorities to summarize the state of research on a subject.
- They summarize the results of research over a long period of time that would be too lengthy to publish as a periodical article. They can also include details that would be too obscure to merit inclusion in a journal article.
*
Why the “Research Paper” Isn’t Working
I recently returned from a brief encounter with some fascinating ideas at “4Cs” – the annual meeting of the Conference on College Composition and Communication.
By
Barbara Fister
April 12, 2011
Inside Higher Ed
http://tinyurl.com/z3bap6q
*
The Centre for Evidence Based Library and Information Practice (C-EBLIP) blog with topics related to research, evidence based library and information practice, and librarianship
Posted on October 4, 2016
by Kristin Bogdan
Engineering and GIS Librarian
University Library, University of Saskatchewan
https://words.usask.ca/ceblipblog/tag/research-paper/
*
Evaluating scientific research quality for better skeptical analysis
2015/05/07 The Original Skeptical Raptor
http://tinyurl.com/zqamksb
Contents
Where to find real science information?
Impact factor and peer review
Authorities or experts
Science or Not also provided a “checklist” of Red Flags or warning signs of a non-expert
Hierarchy of evidence
—————-
Therefore, what are the highest quality types of evidence? In order of best to worst,
Secondary reviews published in peer-reviewed, high-impact journals.
Cohort studies (retrospective studies).
Case-control studies.
Cross sectional surveys.
Case reports
Animal or cell culture studies.
Meeting abstract or poster presentation.
Press releases or news reports.
—————-
Clinical significance
The TL;DR version
Key citations
===================================================================
MORE DATABASE SEARCH RESULTS FOR Source Evaluation for Research Reports
===================================================================
*
Google News
http://tinyurl.com/zth2wlg
*
Google Images
http://tinyurl.com/zn6shfs
*
Google Videos
http://tinyurl.com/jedgnzw
*
Penn State Summon Search
http://tinyurl.com/molwpob
407,483 results
- Archival Material (30) Include Exclude
- Audio Recording (2) Include Exclude
- Book / eBook (251,937) Include Exclude
- Book Chapter (8,773) Include Exclude
- Book Review (3,022) Include Exclude
- Catalog (4) Include Exclude
- Conference Proceeding (1,542) Include Exclude
- Data Set (116) Include Exclude
- Dissertation/Thesis (18,693) Include Exclude
- Electronic Resource (78) Include Exclude
- Government Document (913) Include Exclude
- Journal / eJournal (6) Include Exclude
- Journal Article (104,171) Include Exclude
- Magazine (1) Include Exclude
- Magazine Article (1,379) Include Exclude
- Manuscript (4) Include Exclude
- Market Research (615) Include Exclude
- Microform (5) Include Exclude
- Newsletter (1,573) Include Exclude
- Newspaper (51) Include Exclude
- Newspaper Article (15,613) Include Exclude
- Pamphlet (1) Include Exclude
- Paper (295) Include Exclude
- Patent (1) Include Exclude
- Poster (1) Include Exclude
- Presentation (2) Include Exclude
- Publication (158) Include Exclude
- Reference (1,897) Include Exclude
- Report (523) Include Exclude
- Research Guide (1,642) Include Exclude
- Special Collection (2) Include Exclude
- Standard (14) Include Exclude
- Student Thesis (8) Include Exclude
- Technical Report (22) Include Exclude
- Trade Publication Article (1,151) Include Exclude
- Transcript (152) Include Exclude
- Web Resource (359) Include Exclude
*
Purdue Primo Database FROM Proquest / ExLibris
170,935 for Everything
http://tinyurl.com/lftf9x6
*
TRIP Database
http://tinyurl.com/jl3s9g7
*
PogoFrog
http://tinyurl.com/htlz7du
*
PLOS Database
http://tinyurl.com/jcmgkug
*
United States
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Database
http://tinyurl.com/hde3zhl
*
PUBMED
http://tinyurl.com/h2jug7c
*
BioMed Central
http://tinyurl.com/h8hgb5t
*
Google Domain Limited Web Search (GOV)
http://tinyurl.com/htu9qtr
*
Google Domain Limited Web Search (ORG)
http://tinyurl.com/go8s9uk
Google Domain Limited Web Search (EDU)
*
http://tinyurl.com/gojuc6s
*
Google Domain Limited Web Search (PUBMED)
*
http://tinyurl.com/hjhxo4m
*
Google Domain Limited Web Search (SCIENCEDIRECT)
http://tinyurl.com/h32xml6
*
Google Domain Limited Web Search (JSTOR)
http://tinyurl.com/ja6dgqd
*
Google Domain Limited Web Search (NEWS)
http://tinyurl.com/hrlfvg8
*
Google Domain Limited Web Search (IMAGES)
http://tinyurl.com/glwpakb
*
Google Domain Limited Web Search (VIDEOS)
http://tinyurl.com/zg7l4u7
*
========================================
Research Guide Directory :
Discussion Group Directory
https://sites.google.com/site/researchguidesonsites/
========================================
.
SOURCE EVALUATION : EVALUATING SOURCES :
TERM PAPERS : RESEACH PAPERS : RESEARCH DESIGN :
RESEARCH METHODS : TEACHING RESEARCH SKILLS:
A Selective Bibliography of Sources That Teach
Source Evaluation for Research Papers and
Instruct How to Teach Source Evaluation
Posted on April 11, 2016 by jwneastro
.
.
SOURCE EVALUATION :
EVALUATING SOURCES :
TERM PAPERS :
RESEACH PAPERS :
RESEARCH DESIGN :
RESEARCH METHODS :
TEACHING RESEARCH SKILLS:
A Selective Bibliography of Sources That Teach Source Evaluation
for Research Papers and Instruct How to Teach Source Evaluation
.
.
WEBBIB1516
http://tinyurl.com/q8tavoy
.
.
A Selective Bibliography of Sources That Teach Source Evaluation
for Research Papers and Instruct How to Teach Source Evaluation
.
.
Successful Strategies for Teaching Undergraduate Research
Editors Marta Deyrup, Beth Bloom
Publisher Scarecrow Press, 2013
ISBN 0810887177, 9780810887176
Length 204 pages
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Undergraduates and library research: what’s changed, what hasn’t, what now? /
Mary W. George —
The State of Teaching Today. Research questions and the research question:
what are we teaching when we teach research? /
Heidi L.M. Jacobs —
Understanding the relationship between good research and good writing /
Barbara J. D’Angelo —
Toward the “good” research assignment: a librarian speaks /
Roberta Tipton —
Toward the “good” research assignment: an academic speaks /
Willilamjames Hull Hoffer —
Teaching new media as a form of writing: explorations in evolving genres /
James Elmborg —
From punitive policing to proactive prevention: approaches to teaching information
ethics in the college classroom / Maria T. Accardi —
Assessing the information research process /
Stephanie Sterling Brasley. —
The Strategies in Action: Four Ideas That Work. Sources before search:
a scaffolded approach to teaching research /
Stephanie N. Otis —
RAIDS for research /
Sara D Miller, Nancy C. DeJoy, Benjamin M. Oberdock —
College students as Wikipedia editors: new pathways to information literacy /
Davida Scharf —
Training the trainer: librarians as faculty coaches and workshop designers /
Beth Bloom.
http://tinyurl.com/hum6s9d
.
The Research Paper: A Guide to Library and Internet Research
Authors Dawn Rodrigues, Raymond J. Rodrigues
Edition 3, illustrated
Publisher Prentice Hall, 2003
ISBN 0130982563, 9780130982568
Length 259 pages
http://tinyurl.com/zgmuhmw
.
Research Papers
Authors William Coyle, Joe Law
Edition 16
Publisher Cengage Learning, 2013
ISBN 1133713017, 9781133713012
Length 272 pages
http://tinyurl.com/jna6x9q
.
Building Better Essays
Cengage Advantage Books
New 1st Editions in Developmental English Series
Author Gina Hogan
Publisher Cengage Learning, 2012
ISBN 0495905178, 9780495905172
Length 272 pages
http://tinyurl.com/hrlzco6
.
Quality Research Papers:
For Students of Religion and Theology
Authors
Nancy Jean Vyhmeister, Terry Dwain Robertson
Publisher Harper Collins, 2014
ISBN 0310514037, 9780310514039
Length 304 pages
http://tinyurl.com/ztnndf4
.
Real Essays with Readings:
Writing for Success in College, Work, and Everyday Life
Author Susan Anker
Publisher Macmillan, 2011
ISBN 0312648081, 9780312648084
Length 912 pages
http://tinyurl.com/jt7rjh7
.
Research Paper Handbook: Your Complete Guide
Research Paper Handbook Series
Author James D. Lester
Publisher Good Year Books, 2005
ISBN 1596470763, 9781596470767
Length 232 pages
http://tinyurl.com/hyhgj3k
.
Writing the Research Paper: A Handbook
Authors Anthony Winkler, Jo Ray McCuen-Metherell
Edition 7, illustrated
Publisher Cengage Learning, 2007
ISBN 1413011713, 9781413011715
Length 360 pages
http://tinyurl.com/jch3osm
.
Writing the Research Paper: A Handbook
Authors
Anthony C. Winkler, Jo Ray McCuen-Metherell
Edition 8
Publisher Cengage Learning, 2011
ISBN 1133169023, 9781133169024
Length 360 pages
http://tinyurl.com/jch3osm
.
Principles of Writing Research Papers
Penguin academics
Author James D. Lester
Edition 2, illustrated
Publisher Penguin Academics, 2007
Original from the University of Virginia
Digitized Nov 24, 2009
ISBN 032142610X, 9780321426109
Length 266 pages
http://tinyurl.com/jhyqweg
.
Writing, Reading, and Research
Authors Richard Veit, Christopher Gould
Edition 8, illustrated
Publisher Cengage Learning, 2009
ISBN 0547191049, 9780547191041
Length 640 pages
http://tinyurl.com/zh67dxw
.
The Johns Hopkins Guide to Digital Media
UPCC book collections on Project MUSE
Author Marie-Laure Ryan
Editors Marie-Laure Ryan, Lori Emerson, Benjamin J. Robertson
Edition illustrated
Publisher JHU Press, 2013
ISBN 142141225X, 9781421412252
Length 553 pages
http://tinyurl.com/jnldz3s
.
MLA Handbook for Writers of Research Papers
Authors
Joseph Gibaldi,
Modern Language Association of America
Edition 4, illustrated, reprint
Publisher
Modern Language Association of America, 1995
ISBN 0873525655, 9780873525657
Length 293 pages
http://tinyurl.com/gp3lytu
.
A Manual for Writers of Research Papers, Theses, and Dissertations,
Seventh Edition:
Chicago Style for Students and Researchers
Chicago Guides to Writing, Editing, and
Author Kate L. Turabian
Contributors Wayne C. Booth, Gregory G. Colomb,
Joseph M. Williams, Wayne C. University of Chicago Press Staff
Edition revised
Publisher University of Chicago Press, 2009
ISBN 0226823385, 9780226823386
Length 436 pages
http://tinyurl.com/hxvjaoo
http://tinyurl.com/zz8sl3t
.
The Sundance Writer:
A Rhetoric, Reader, and Research Guide, Brief
Author Mark Connelly
Edition 5
Publisher Cengage Learning, 2012
ISBN 113371370X, 9781133713708
Length 752 pages
http://tinyurl.com/zcpqnun
.
The Wadsworth Handbook
Authors Laurie G. Kirszner, Stephen R. Mandell
Edition 10
Publisher Cengage Learning, 2013
ISBN 1285500121, 9781285500126
Length 864 pages
http://tinyurl.com/j3ngfsl
.
Usability of Complex Information Systems:
Evaluation of User Interaction
Editors Michael Albers, Brian Still
Edition illustrated
Publisher CRC Press, 2010
ISBN 1439828954, 9781439828953
Length 399 pages
http://tinyurl.com/j9m325y
.
Fusion: Integrated Reading and Writing, Book 2
Authors
Dave Kemper, Verne Meyer, John Van Rys, Patrick Sebranek
Edition 2
Publisher Cengage Learning, 2015
ISBN 1305537947, 9781305537941
Length 656 pages
http://tinyurl.com/hfvtqep
.
Quick Access: Essays and Term Papers
Quick Access
Author Research and Education Association
Publisher Research & Education Assoc., 2009
ISBN 0738607282, 9780738607283
Length 4 pages
.
A Guide to MLA Documentation
Author Joseph F. Trimmer
Edition 9, illustrated, annotated
Publisher Cengage Learning, 2012
ISBN 1111837074, 9781111837075
Length 48 pages
http://tinyurl.com/glqhw3a
.
Insightful Writing: A Process Rhetoric with Readings
Authors David Sabrio, Mitchell Burchfield
Edition illustrated
Publisher Cengage Learning, 2008
ISBN 0618870261, 9780618870264
Length 336 pages
http://tinyurl.com/jt2tg5p
.
The Chicago Manual of Style
Author University of Chicago. Press
Contributor University of Chicago
Publisher University of Chicago Press, 2003
ISBN 0226104036, 9780226104034
http://tinyurl.com/grkff5r
.
The Curious Researcher:
A Guide to Writing Research Papers
Author Bruce Ballenger
Edition 7, illustrated
Publisher Pearson Education, 2011
ISBN 0205172873, 9780205172870
Length 348 pages
http://tinyurl.com/zohp3eo
.
Writing Research Papers Across the Curriculum
Advantage (Thomson)
Advantage series
Author Susan M. Hubbuch
Edition 5, illustrated
Publisher Thomson Wadsworth, 2004
ISBN 1413002374, 9781413002379
Length 450 pages
http://tinyurl.com/z9pxmul
.
Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Paper: Evaluating Sources
University of Southern California Libraries
http://libguides.usc.edu/c.php?g=235034&p=1561749
Purpose of Guide
Types of Research Designs
- Choosing a Research Problem
- Preparing to Write
- The Abstract
- The Introduction
- The Literature Review
- The Methodology
- The Results
Using Non-Textual Elements
- The Discussion
- The Conclusion
- Proofreading Your Paper
- Citing Sources
Annotated Bibliography
Giving an Oral Presentation
Grading Someone Else’s Paper
How to Manage Group Projects
Writing a Book Review
Writing a Case Study
Writing a Field Report
Writing a Policy Memo
Writing a Research Proposa
http://libguides.usc.edu/c.php?g=235034&p=1561749
.
.
.
How to Write a Research Paper
http://guides.temple.edu/research-papers
.
How to Write an Annotated Bibliography
http://guides.temple.edu/annotated-bibliographies
.
How to Find and Write Book Reviews:
Databases and Search Engine Searches for Finding Book Reviews
http://guides.temple.edu/bkrev
.
Digital Humanities and Digital Initiatives Sources
http://guides.temple.edu/digital-humanities
.
DISSERTATIONS: Finding and Writing Dissertations and Theses
http://guides.temple.edu/dissertations
.
Faculty Credentialing
http://guides.temple.edu/FacultyCredentialing
.
GOVERNMENT PUBLICATION MANUALS :
Government Writing Manuals Guides and Handbooks
http://guides.temple.edu/GovWritingManuals
.
Grey Literature Sources and Tools
http://guides.temple.edu/grey-literature
.
INFORMATION LITERACY AND FRIENDS
http://tinyurl.com/78a4shn
.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT GUIDE SERIES:
COPYRIGHT, Intellectual Property and Plagiarism Sources
http://guides.temple.edu/copyright-plagiarism
.
Fair Use Under Copyright Law:
Fair Use Books, Websites and Database Search Results
http://guides.temple.edu/fair-use
.
JOURNAL CITATION RANKING SUBJECT LISTS FEATURING SCIMAGO:
Citation Analysis, Journal Rankings and Rankings Within Disciplines
and Faculty Assessment and Credentialing
http://guides.temple.edu/journal-citation-ranking
.
How to Create a Literature Review
http://guides.temple.edu/literature-review
.
Media Literacy and News Literacy
http://guides.temple.edu/medialit
.
How to Create a Meta-Analysis and a Systematic Review
http://guides.temple.edu/Meta-Analysis
.
NEWS: Newspapers News and News Archive Resources
http://guides.temple.edu/news
.
Plain English Writing Books and Database Search Results
http://guides.temple.edu/plain-english
.
REFWORKS
http://guides.temple.edu/ref-works
STATISTICS:
Databases, Sources and Database Search Results
for Statisitical Data Compilations and Publications
Including an Extensive Section of United States
Government Agencies with Database Search Results
from Nineteen Database Search Links for Each Agency
http://guides.temple.edu/statistics-sources
.
Research Guide Directory : Discussion Group Directory
https://sites.google.com/site/researchguidesonsites/
.
.
[PDF] Evaluating Sources of Information
PK Hurley – Online Text and Course Materials – Citeseer
http://tinyurl.com/gvt7qfy
.
Articles
Writing Centers and Libraries: One-Stop Shopping for Better Term Papers
DOI:10.1080/02763870802101310
Rachel Cookea* & Carol Bledsoeb
pages 119-127
Published online: 12 Dec 2008
The Reference Librarian
Volume 49, Issue 2, 2008
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02763870802101310
http://tinyurl.com/zvakyqj
.
MacDonald, A. B.
(2010).
Multiple Visions of the Research Paper:
How Compositionists and Librarians Understand, Represent, and Teach
the Research Process
(Doctoral dissertation, Auburn University).
https://etd.auburn.edu/handle/10415/2072
.
Donahue, A. E., and Gamtso, C.
(2010).
Term papers, Google, and library anxiety:
how can information literacy improve students’ research skills?.
http://tinyurl.com/hxtbz99
.
DATABASE SEARCH RESULTS: Temple Summon Search
http://tinyurl.com/zwvbhrl
.
The Critical Assessment of Research:
Traditional and New Methods of Evaluation
Chandos information professional series
Authors Alan Bailin, Ann Grafstein
Publisher Chandos, 2010
Original from University of Chicago
Digitized Apr 18, 2011
ISBN 1843345439, 9781843345435
Length 121 pages
http://tinyurl.com/m74fl6k
*
Educational Research:
Why ‘What Works’ Doesn’t Work
Volume 1 of Educational Research
Editors Paul Smeyers, Marc Depaepe
Edition illustrated, reprint
Publisher
Springer Science & Business Media, 2007
ISBN 1402053088, 9781402053085
Length 196 pages
http://tinyurl.com/kgwclsu
*
Managing Quality in Qualitative Research
Qualitative Research Kit
Author Uwe Flick
Edition reprint
Publisher SAGE, 2008
ISBN 144620524X, 9781446205242
Length 160 pages
http://tinyurl.com/kg85uyf
*
A Bird’s-Eye View of Assessment:
Selections from Editor’s Notes
Volume 10 of Assessment Update Special Collections
Editor Trudy W. Banta
Publisher John Wiley & Sons, 2011
ISBN 1118109155, 9781118109151
Length 96 pages
http://tinyurl.com/myjgj99
*
“evaluation of research” OR “evaluating research” OR “research evaluation” OR (assessment AND “quality of research”)
*
Handbook of Family Literacy
Editor Barbara Hanna Wasik
Edition illustrated, reprint
Publisher Routledge, 2012
ISBN 0415884578, 9780415884570
Length 479 pages
http://tinyurl.com/mlk74z3
*
Organizations and Strategies in Astronomy, Volume 3
Volume 256; Volume 266; Volume 280; Volume 296;
Volume 310 of Astrophysics and Space Science Library :
a series of books on the recent developments of space
science and of general geophysics and astrophysics
Astrophysics and Space Science Library, ISSN 0067-0057
Organizations and Strategies in Astronomy, André Heck
Editor Andre Heck
Edition illustrated
Publisher Springer Science & Business Media, 2002
ISBN 1402008120, 9781402008122
Length 238 pages
http://tinyurl.com/kkmyzgu |
*
Library Assessment in Higher Education
Author Joseph R. Matthews
Publisher Greenwood Publishing Group, 2007
ISBN 031309487X, 9780313094873
Length 146 pages
http://tinyurl.com/kbnjx8e
*
Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research:
The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems
Editors Henk F. Moed, Wolfgang Glänzel, Ulrich Schmoch
Edition illustrated
Publisher Springer Science & Business Media, 2004
ISBN 1402027028, 9781402027024
Length 800 pages
http://tinyurl.com/kx88d3b
*
Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation
Volume 9 of Information Science and Knowledge Management
Author Henk F. Moed
Edition illustrated
Publisher Springer Science & Business Media, 2006
ISBN 1402037147, 9781402037146
Length 348 pages
http://tinyurl.com/n69g48t
*
Evidence-Based Prevention
Prevention Practice Kit
Editors Katherine Raczynski,
Michael Waldo, Jonathan P. Schwartz,
Arthur M. Horne
Publisher SAGE Publications, 2012
ISBN 1483307654, 9781483307657
Length 96 pages
http://tinyurl.com/kgebcj3
*
The SAGE Handbook of Social Work Research
Sage Handbooks
Author Ian Shaw
Edition illustrated
Publisher SAGE Publications, 2009
ISBN 1412934982, 9781412934985
Length 572 pages
http://tinyurl.com/mtw92na
*
An Introduction to Qualitative Research
Author Uwe Flick
Publisher SAGE, 2009
ISBN 1446241319, 9781446241318
Length 528 pages
http://tinyurl.com/k86gu87
*
Issues in Discovery, Experimental,
and Laboratory Medicine:
2011 Edition
Contributor Q. Ashton Acton, PhD
Publisher ScholarlyEditions, 2012
ISBN 1464963509, 9781464963506
Length 3453 pages
http://tinyurl.com/n8rg9cx
*
The Quality of Qualitative Research
Introducing Qualitative Methods series
Author Clive Seale
Publisher SAGE, 1999
ISBN 144627621X, 9781446276211
Length 224 pages
http://tinyurl.com/k66e3ug
*
How to Do Research: A Psychologist’s Guide
Author Jonathan St. B. T. Evans
Edition illustrated
Publisher Taylor & Francis, 2005
ISBN 1841695424, 9781841695426
Length 126 pages
http://tinyurl.com/kmwftds
*
.
Purpose of Guide
Types of Research Designs
- Choosing a Research Problem
- Preparing to Write
- The Abstract
- The Introduction
- The Literature Review
- The Methodology
- The Results
Using Non-Textual Elements
- The Discussion
- The Conclusion
- Proofreading Your Paper
- Citing Sources
Annotated Bibliography
Giving an Oral Presentation
Grading Someone Else’s Paper
How to Manage Group Projects
Writing a Book Review
Writing a Case Study
Writing a Field Report
Writing a Policy Memo
Writing a Research Proposa
http://libguides.usc.edu/c.php?g=235034&p=1561749
.
.
.
How to Write a Research Paper
http://guides.temple.edu/research-papers
.
How to Write an Annotated Bibliography
http://guides.temple.edu/annotated-bibliographies
.
How to Find and Write Book Reviews:
Databases and Search Engine Searches for Finding Book Reviews
http://guides.temple.edu/bkrev
.
Digital Humanities and Digital Initiatives Sources
http://guides.temple.edu/digital-humanities
.
DISSERTATIONS: Finding and Writing Dissertations and Theses
http://guides.temple.edu/dissertations
.
Faculty Credentialing
http://guides.temple.edu/FacultyCredentialing
.
GOVERNMENT PUBLICATION MANUALS :
Government Writing Manuals Guides and Handbooks
http://guides.temple.edu/GovWritingManuals
.
Grey Literature Sources and Tools
http://guides.temple.edu/grey-literature
.
INFORMATION LITERACY AND FRIENDS
http://tinyurl.com/78a4shn
.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT GUIDE SERIES:
COPYRIGHT, Intellectual Property and Plagiarism Sources
http://guides.temple.edu/copyright-plagiarism
.
Fair Use Under Copyright Law:
Fair Use Books, Websites and Database Search Results
http://guides.temple.edu/fair-use
.
JOURNAL CITATION RANKING SUBJECT LISTS FEATURING SCIMAGO:
Citation Analysis, Journal Rankings and Rankings Within Disciplines
and Faculty Assessment and Credentialing
http://guides.temple.edu/journal-citation-ranking
.
How to Create a Literature Review
http://guides.temple.edu/literature-review
.
Media Literacy and News Literacy
http://guides.temple.edu/medialit
.
How to Create a Meta-Analysis and a Systematic Review
http://guides.temple.edu/Meta-Analysis
.
NEWS: Newspapers News and News Archive Resources
http://guides.temple.edu/news
.
Plain English Writing Books and Database Search Results
http://guides.temple.edu/plain-english
.
REFWORKS
http://guides.temple.edu/ref-works
STATISTICS:
Databases, Sources and Database Search Results
for Statisitical Data Compilations and Publications
Including an Extensive Section of United States
Government Agencies with Database Search Results
from Nineteen Database Search Links for Each Agency
http://guides.temple.edu/statistics-sources
.
Research Guide Directory : Discussion Group Directory
https://sites.google.com/site/researchguidesonsites/
.
.
[PDF] Evaluating Sources of Information
PK Hurley – Online Text and Course Materials – Citeseer
http://tinyurl.com/gvt7qfy
.
Articles
Writing Centers and Libraries: One-Stop Shopping for Better Term Papers
DOI:10.1080/02763870802101310
Rachel Cookea* & Carol Bledsoeb
pages 119-127
Published online: 12 Dec 2008
The Reference Librarian
Volume 49, Issue 2, 2008
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02763870802101310
http://tinyurl.com/zvakyqj
.
MacDonald, A. B.
(2010).
Multiple Visions of the Research Paper:
How Compositionists and Librarians Understand, Represent, and Teach
the Research Process
(Doctoral dissertation, Auburn University).
https://etd.auburn.edu/handle/10415/2072
.
Donahue, A. E., and Gamtso, C.
(2010).
Term papers, Google, and library anxiety:
how can information literacy improve students’ research skills?.
http://tinyurl.com/hxtbz99
.
DATABASE SEARCH RESULTS: Penn State Summon Search
http://tinyurl.com/ltnjzzv
(“term paper” OR “term papers” OR “research paper” OR “research papers”)
AND (“source evaluation” OR “evaluating sources”)
2,774 results
Source Types
- Book / eBook (1,960) Include Exclude
- Book Chapter (32) Include Exclude
- Book Review (21) Include Exclude
- Conference Proceeding (5) Include Exclude
- Dissertation/Thesis (52) Include Exclude
- Government Document (3) Include Exclude
- Journal Article (335) Include Exclude
- Magazine Article (7) Include Exclude
- Newsletter (2) Include Exclude
- Newspaper Article (15) Include Exclude
- Poster (1) Include Exclude
- Reference (23) Include Exclude
- Report (1) Include Exclude
- Research Guide (347) Include Exclude
- Trade Publication Article (2) Include Exclude
- Web Resource (3) Include Exclude
Content Sample
MLA handbook for writers of research papers
byGibaldi, Joseph
1999, 5th ed.
Book: Stacks – General Collection, LB2369.M165 1999, Penn State Beaver (+8 More)
MLA handbook for writers of research papers
byGibaldi, Joseph
2009, 7th ed.
The MLA Handbook is published by the Modern Language Association, the authority
on MLA documentation style. Widely adopted in high schools, colleges, and…
The elements of library research: what every student needs to know
byGeorge, Mary W
2008
To do solid academic research, college students need to look beyond the computer search engine.
This short, practical book introduces students to the important…
10 steps in writing the research paper
byMarkman, Roberta H; Markman, Peter T; Waddell, Marie L
1989, 4th ed.
The Little, Brown guide to writing research papers
byMeyer, Michael
1985, 2nd ed.
Writing Centers and Libraries: One-Stop Shopping for Better Term Papers
byCooke, Rachel; Bledsoe, Carol
The Reference Librarian, 09/2008, Volume 49, Issue 2
Beyond Consultation: A New Model for Librarian’s Office Hours
byAvery, Susan; Hahn, Jim; Zilic, Melissa
Public Services Quarterly, 09/2008, Volume 4, Issue 3
Writing a research paper: students explain their process
byDubicki, Eleonora
Reference Services Review, 11/2015, Volume 43, Issue 4
Writing research papers: a complete guide
byLester, James D., Sr; Lester, James D., Jr
2012, 14th ed.
.
.
.
The Critical Assessment of Research:
Traditional and New Methods of Evaluation
Chandos information professional series
Authors Alan Bailin, Ann Grafstein
Publisher Chandos, 2010
Original from University of Chicago
Digitized Apr 18, 2011
ISBN 1843345439, 9781843345435
Length 121 pages
http://tinyurl.com/m74fl6k
*
Educational Research:
Why ‘What Works’ Doesn’t Work
Volume 1 of Educational Research
Editors Paul Smeyers, Marc Depaepe
Edition illustrated, reprint
Publisher
Springer Science & Business Media, 2007
ISBN 1402053088, 9781402053085
Length 196 pages
http://tinyurl.com/kgwclsu
*
Managing Quality in Qualitative Research
Qualitative Research Kit
Author Uwe Flick
Edition reprint
Publisher SAGE, 2008
ISBN 144620524X, 9781446205242
Length 160 pages
http://tinyurl.com/kg85uyf
*
A Bird’s-Eye View of Assessment:
Selections from Editor’s Notes
Volume 10 of Assessment Update Special Collections
Editor Trudy W. Banta
Publisher John Wiley & Sons, 2011
ISBN 1118109155, 9781118109151
Length 96 pages
http://tinyurl.com/myjgj99
*
“evaluation of research” OR “evaluating research” OR “research evaluation” OR (assessment AND “quality of research”)
*
Handbook of Family Literacy
Editor Barbara Hanna Wasik
Edition illustrated, reprint
Publisher Routledge, 2012
ISBN 0415884578, 9780415884570
Length 479 pages
http://tinyurl.com/mlk74z3
*
Organizations and Strategies in Astronomy, Volume 3
Volume 256; Volume 266; Volume 280; Volume 296;
Volume 310 of Astrophysics and Space Science Library :
a series of books on the recent developments of space
science and of general geophysics and astrophysics
Astrophysics and Space Science Library, ISSN 0067-0057
Organizations and Strategies in Astronomy, André Heck
Editor Andre Heck
Edition illustrated
Publisher Springer Science & Business Media, 2002
ISBN 1402008120, 9781402008122
Length 238 pages
http://tinyurl.com/kkmyzgu
*
Library Assessment in Higher Education
Author Joseph R. Matthews
Publisher Greenwood Publishing Group, 2007
ISBN 031309487X, 9780313094873
Length 146 pages
http://tinyurl.com/kbnjx8e
*
Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research:
The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems
Editors Henk F. Moed, Wolfgang Glänzel, Ulrich Schmoch
Edition illustrated
Publisher Springer Science & Business Media, 2004
ISBN 1402027028, 9781402027024
Length 800 pages
http://tinyurl.com/kx88d3b
*
Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation
Volume 9 of Information Science and Knowledge Management
Author Henk F. Moed
Edition illustrated
Publisher Springer Science & Business Media, 2006
ISBN 1402037147, 9781402037146
Length 348 pages
http://tinyurl.com/n69g48t
*
Evidence-Based Prevention
Prevention Practice Kit
Editors Katherine Raczynski,
Michael Waldo, Jonathan P. Schwartz,
Arthur M. Horne
Publisher SAGE Publications, 2012
ISBN 1483307654, 9781483307657
Length 96 pages
http://tinyurl.com/kgebcj3
*
The SAGE Handbook of Social Work Research
Sage Handbooks
Author Ian Shaw
Edition illustrated
Publisher SAGE Publications, 2009
ISBN 1412934982, 9781412934985
Length 572 pages
http://tinyurl.com/mtw92na
*
An Introduction to Qualitative Research
Author Uwe Flick
Publisher SAGE, 2009
ISBN 1446241319, 9781446241318
Length 528 pages
http://tinyurl.com/k86gu87
*
Issues in Discovery, Experimental,
and Laboratory Medicine:
2011 Edition
Contributor Q. Ashton Acton, PhD
Publisher ScholarlyEditions, 2012
ISBN 1464963509, 9781464963506
Length 3453 pages
http://tinyurl.com/n8rg9cx
*
The Quality of Qualitative Research
Introducing Qualitative Methods series
Author Clive Seale
Publisher SAGE, 1999
ISBN 144627621X, 9781446276211
Length 224 pages
http://tinyurl.com/k66e3ug
*
How to Do Research: A Psychologist’s Guide
Author Jonathan St. B. T. Evans
Edition illustrated
Publisher Taylor & Francis, 2005
ISBN 1841695424, 9781841695426
Length 126 pages
http://tinyurl.com/kmwftds
*
Braskamp, Larry A., and John C. Ory.
Assessing Faculty Work: Enhancing Individual and Institutional Performance.
Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. Jossey-Bass Inc.,
350 Sansome Street, San Francisco, CA 94104, 1994.
http://tinyurl.com/ln4pwf7
*
Armijo‐Olivo, Susan, Carla R. Stiles, Neil A. Hagen, Patricia D. Biondo, and Greta G. Cummings.
“Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews:
a comparison of the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool
and the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool: methodological research.”
Journal of evaluation in clinical practice 18, no. 1 (2012): 12-18.
http://tinyurl.com/krpalg8
*
Hall, C. Michael.
“Publish and perish?
Bibliometric analysis, journal ranking and the assessment of research quality in tourism.”
Tourism Management 32, no. 1 (2011): 16-27.
http://tinyurl.com/khoawg8
*
Muldoon, Matthew F., Steven D. Barger, Janine D. Flory, and Stephen B. Manuck.
“What are quality of life measurements measuring?.”
BMJ: British Medical Journal 316, no. 7130 (1998): 542.
http://tinyurl.com/l2dzlxk
*
Glasziou, Paul, Jan Vandenbroucke, and Iain Chalmers. ”
Assessing the quality of research.”
BMJ: British Medical Journal 328, no. 7430 (2004): 39.
http://tinyurl.com/ldbfqfq
*
Lee, Kirby P., Marieka Schotland, Peter Bacchetti, and Lisa A. Bero.
“Association of journal quality indicators with methodological quality of clinical research articles.”
JAMA 287, no. 21 (2002): 2805-2808.
http://tinyurl.com/lqnux5m
*
Weiskopf, Nicole Gray, and Chunhua Weng.
“Methods and dimensions of electronic health record data quality assessment:
enabling reuse for clinical research.”
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 20, no. 1 (2013): 144-151.
http://tinyurl.com/llozgtu
*
Shea, Beverley J., Candyce Hamel, George A. Wells, Lex M. Bouter, Elizabeth Kristjansson,
Jeremy Grimshaw, David A. Henry, and Maarten Boers.
“AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool
to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews.”
Journal of clinical epidemiology 62, no. 10 (2009): 1013-1020.
http://tinyurl.com/lhp97rl
*
Akkerman, Sanne, Wilfried Admiraal, Mieke Brekelmans, and Heinze Oost.
“Auditing quality of research in social sciences.”
Quality & Quantity 42, no. 2 (2008): 257-274.
http://tinyurl.com/l8svcgb
*
Cheek, Julianne, Bridget Garnham, and James Quan.
“What’s in a number? Issues in providing evidence of impact and quality of research (ers).”
Qualitative Health Research 16, no. 3 (2006): 423-435.
http://tinyurl.com/kfugm4k
*
Oxman, Andrew D., and Gordon H. Guyatt.
“Validation of an index of the quality of review articles.”
Journal of clinical epidemiology 44, no. 11 (1991): 1271-1278.
http://tinyurl.com/lde5upj
*
Rapley, Mark.
Quality of life research: A critical introduction.
Sage, 2003.
http://tinyurl.com/lowuk2u
*
Campos-Outcalt, Douglas, Janet Senf, Arleen J. Watkins, and Stan Bastacky.
“The effects of medical school curricula, faculty role models, and biomedical research support
on choice of generalist physician careers: a review and quality assessment of the literature.”
Academic Medicine 70, no. 7 (1995): 611-9.
http://tinyurl.com/mhtlpsh
*
Tan, David L.
“The assessment of quality in higher education: A critical review of the literature and research.”
Research in higher education 24, no. 3 (1986): 223-265.
http://tinyurl.com/khhooz7
*
Taylor, Jim.
“The assessment of research quality in UK universities: Peer review or metrics?.”
British Journal of Management 22, no. 2 (2011): 202-217.
http://tinyurl.com/mjnzjvr
*
Roberts, Sir Gareth.
Review of research assessment.
London: RA Review, 2003.
http://tinyurl.com/lhj9ca7
*
Chase, Richard B.
“A classification and evaluation of research in operations management.”
Journal of Operations Management 1, no. 1 (1980): 9-14.
http://tinyurl.com/lq4uoyl
*
Seale, Clive.
“Quality in qualitative research.”
Qualitative inquiry 5, no. 4 (1999): 465-478.
http://tinyurl.com/ljb2bn8
*
Smith, Richard.
“Measuring the social impact of research: difficult but necessary.”
BMJ: British Medical Journal 323, no. 7312 (2001): 528.
http://tinyurl.com/mzo9ywl
*
Lombard, Matthew, Jennifer Snyder‐Duch, and Cheryl Campanella Bracken.
“Content analysis in mass communication: Assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability.”
Human communication research 28, no. 4 (2002): 587-604.
http://tinyurl.com/my4u7r4
*
Valentine, Jeffrey C., and Harris Cooper.
“A systematic and transparent approach for assessing
the methodological quality of intervention effectiveness research:
the Study Design and Implementation Assessment Device (Study DIAD).”
Psychological methods 13, no. 2 (2008): 130.
http://tinyurl.com/n32wa7z
*
Furlong, John, and Alis Oancea.
“Assessing quality in applied and practice-based educational research: A framework for discussion.”
Review of Australian research in education: counterpoints on the quality and impact of educational research––
a special issue of the Australian Educational Researcher 6 (2005): 89-104.
http://tinyurl.com/n95xsp5
*
Lexchin, Joel, Lisa A. Bero, Benjamin Djulbegovic, and Otavio Clark.
“Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic review.”
Bmj 326, no. 7400 (2003): 1167-1170.
http://tinyurl.com/kedqmfh
*
Dusenbury, Linda, Rosalind Brannigan, Mathea Falco, and William B. Hansen.
“A review of research on fidelity of implementation:
implications for drug abuse prevention in school settings.”
Health education research 18, no. 2 (2003): 237-256.
http://tinyurl.com/lyhzc7j
*
Chalmers, Iain, and Paul Glasziou.
“Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence.”
Obstetrics & Gynecology 114, no. 6 (2009): 1341-1345.
http://tinyurl.com/lztseuj
*
Geuna, Aldo, and Ben R. Martin.
“University research evaluation and funding: An international comparison.”
Minerva 41, no. 4 (2003): 277-304.
http://tinyurl.com/k38oj7e
*
Olivo, Susan Armijo, Luciana Gazzi Macedo, Inae Caroline Gadotti, Jorge Fuentes,
Tasha Stanton, and David J. Magee.
“Scales to assess the quality of randomized controlled trials: a systematic review.”
Physical therapy 88, no. 2 (2008): 156.
http://tinyurl.com/lpmtukc
*
Schmoch, Ulrich, and Torben Schubert.
“Are international co-publications an indicator for quality of scientific research?.”
Scientometrics 74, no. 3 (2007): 361-377.
http://tinyurl.com/lay8ovw
*
Tooth, Leigh, Robert Ware, Chris Bain, David M. Purdie, and Annette Dobson.
“Quality of reporting of observational longitudinal research.”
American Journal of Epidemiology 161, no. 3 (2005): 280-288.
http://tinyurl.com/ljr9ryn
*
Sanderson, Simon, Iain D. Tatt, and Julian PT Higgins.
“Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology:
a systematic review and annotated bibliography.”
International journal of epidemiology 36, no. 3 (2007): 666-676.
http://tinyurl.com/my9aelz
*
Barker, Katharine.
“The UK Research Assessment Exercise:
the evolution of a national research evaluation system.”
Research Evaluation 16, no. 1 (2007): 3-12.
http://tinyurl.com/m4fudjo
*
Elton, Lewis.
“The UK research assessment exercise: unintended consequences.”
Higher Education Quarterly 54, no. 3 (2000): 274-283.
http://tinyurl.com/llg9b4d
*
Moed, Henk F.
“The future of research evaluation
rests with an intelligent combination of advanced metrics and transparent peer review.”
Science and Public Policy (SPP) 34, no. 8 (2007).
http://tinyurl.com/mez3f3k
*
Staniszewska, Sophie, Jo Brett, Carole Mockford, and Rosemary Barber.
“The GRIPP checklist: strengthening the quality of patient and public involvement reporting in research.”
International journal of technology assessment in health care 27, no. 04 (2011): 391-399.
http://tinyurl.com/kvfgb6s
*
Popay, Jennie, Anne Rogers, and Gareth Williams.
“Rationale and standards for the systematic review of qualitative literature in health services research.”
Qualitative health research 8, no. 3 (1998): 341-351.
http://tinyurl.com/lvfn6la
*
Ivanitskaya, Lana, Irene O. Boyle, and Anne Marie Casey.
“Health information literacy and competencies of information age students:
results from the interactive online Research Readiness Self-Assessment (RRSA).”
Journal of Medical Internet Research 8, no. 2 (2006): e6.
http://tinyurl.com/mlk49yz
*
Hanney, Stephen R., Miguel A. Gonzalez-Block, Martin J. Buxton, and Maurice Kogan.
“The utilisation of health research in policy-making:
concepts, examples and methods of assessment.”
Health research policy and systems 1, no. 1 (2003): 2.
http://tinyurl.com/lhgoqcb
*
Northcott, Deryl, and Simon Linacre.
“Producing spaces for academic discourse:
The impact of research assessment exercises and journal quality rankings.”
Australian Accounting Review 20, no. 1 (2010): 38-54.
http://tinyurl.com/k2yc4bd
*
Gough, David.
“Weight of evidence: a framework for the appraisal of the quality and relevance of evidence.”
Research papers in education 22, no. 2 (2007): 213-228.
http://tinyurl.com/lukmru9
*
Lee, Frederic S.
“The Research Assessment Exercise,
the state and the dominance of mainstream economics in British universities.”
Cambridge Journal of Economics 31, no. 2 (2007): 309-325.
http://tinyurl.com/n4b5zx2
*
Besley, Tina.
Assessing the quality of educational research in higher education: International perspectives.
Sense Publishers, 2009.
http://tinyurl.com/l928brh
*
Wortman, Paul M.
“Judging research quality.”
The handbook of research synthesis (1994): 97-109.
http://tinyurl.com/kql7sxp
*
Foster, Peter.
“‘Never mind the quality, feel the impact’: a methodological assessment of teacher research
sponsored by the Teacher Training Agency.”
British Journal of Educational Studies 47, no. 4 (1999): 380-398.
http://tinyurl.com/ljxb9cn
*
Doyle, J. R., and A. J. Arthurs.
“Judging the quality of research in business schools: The UK as a case study.”
Omega 23, no. 3 (1995): 257-270.
http://tinyurl.com/kpr4bog
*
Barnett-Page, Elaine, and James Thomas.
“Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review.”
BMC medical research methodology 9, no. 1 (2009): 59.
http://tinyurl.com/khfht5o
*
Vaughn, John.
“Accreditation, commercial rankings, and new approaches
to assessing the quality of university research and education programmes in the United States.”
Higher Education in Europe 27, no. 4 (2002): 433-441.
http://tinyurl.com/jwqk4su
*
Adams, Guy B., and Jay D. White.
“Dissertation research in public administration and cognate fields:
An assessment of methods and quality.”
Public Administration Review (1994): 565-576.
http://tinyurl.com/mzlv28p
*
Emerson, John D., Elisabeth Burdick, David C. Hoaglin, Frederick Mosteller, and Thomas C. Chalmers.
“An empirical study of the possible relation of treatment differences to quality scores
in controlled randomized clinical trials.”
Controlled clinical trials 11, no. 5 (1990): 339-352.
http://tinyurl.com/lkqpg6d
*
Korhonen, Pekka, Risto Tainio, and Jyrki Wallenius.
“Value efficiency analysis of academic research.”
European Journal of Operational Research 130, no. 1 (2001): 121-132.
http://tinyurl.com/l2tfjct
*
Al-Benna, Sammy, Durayd Alzoubaidi, and Yazan Al-Ajam.
“Evidence-based burn care—an assessment of the methodological quality of research published
in burn care journals from 1982 to 2008.”
Burns 36, no. 8 (2010): 1190-1195.
http://tinyurl.com/kfaj7ae
*
Tashakkori, Abbas, and Charles Teddlie.
“Quality of inferences in mixed methods research: Calling for an integrative framework.”
Advances in mixed methods research (2008): 101-119.
http://tinyurl.com/lfyox7r
*
Hicks, Diana.
“Evolving regimes of multi-university research evaluation.”
Higher Education 57, no. 4 (2009): 393-404.
http://tinyurl.com/mg2sj62
*
Jin, Bihui, and Ronald Rousseau.
“Evaluation of research performance and scientometric indicators in China.”
In Handbook of quantitative science and technology research,
pp. 497-514. Springer Netherlands, 2004.
http://tinyurl.com/lfogbcs
*
Tomlinson, Stephan.
“The research assessment exercise and medical research.”
British Medical Journal 320, no. 7235 (2000): 636.
http://tinyurl.com/lrmvxyp
*
Burla, Laila, Birte Knierim, Jurgen Barth, Katharina Liewald, Margreet Duetz, and Thomas Abel.
“From text to codings: intercoder reliability assessment in qualitative content analysis.”
Nursing research 57, no. 2 (2008): 113-117.
http://tinyurl.com/mqbcnna
*
Orton, Lois, Ffion Lloyd-Williams, David Taylor-Robinson, Martin O’Flaherty, and Simon Capewell.
“The use of research evidence in public health decision making processes: systematic review.”
PloS one 6, no. 7 (2011): e21704.
http://tinyurl.com/la6m9vs
*
Hemingway, Harry, Peter Philipson, Ruoling Chen, Natalie K. Fitzpatrick, Jacqueline Damant,
Martin Shipley, Keith R. Abrams et al.
“Evaluating the quality of research into a single prognostic biomarker:
a systematic review and meta-analysis of 83 studies of C-reactive protein
in stable coronary artery disease.”
PLoS Med 7, no. 6 (2010): e1000286.
http://tinyurl.com/l5ujavb
*
Van der Meulen, Barend, and Arie Rip.
“Evaluation of societal quality of public sector research in the Netherlands.”
Research Evaluation 9, no. 1 (2000): 11-25.
http://tinyurl.com/k2s2ojw
*
Howley, Lisa, Karen Szauter, Linda Perkowski, Maurice Clifton, and Nancy McNaughton.
“Quality of standardised patient research reports in the medical education literature:
review and recommendations.”
Medical education 42, no. 4 (2008): 350-358.
http://tinyurl.com/leoafrg
*
Oppenheim, Charles.
“The correlation between citation counts and the 1992 research assessment exercise ratings
for British research in genetics, anatomy and archaeology.”
Journal of documentation 53, no. 5 (1997): 477-487.
http://tinyurl.com/k8xjzuw
*
Long, Andrew F., and Mary Godfrey.
“An evaluation tool to assess the quality of qualitative research studies.”
International Journal of Social Research Methodology 7, no. 2 (2004): 181-196.
http://tinyurl.com/lrbs4em
*
Rey-Rocha, Jesús, M. José Martín-Sempere, Jesús Martínez-Frías, and Fernando López-Vera.
“Some misuses of journal impact factor in research evaluation.”
Cortex 37, no. 4 (2001): 595-597.
http://tinyurl.com/l84zeka
*
Falchikov, Nancy, and David Boud.
“Student self-assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis.”
Review of Educational Research 59, no. 4 (1989): 395-430.
http://tinyurl.com/mem5rkh
*
Lundh, Andreas, and Peter C. Gøtzsche.
“Recommendations by Cochrane Review Groups for assessment of the risk of bias in studies.”
BMC medical research methodology 8, no. 1 (2008): 22.
http://tinyurl.com/m8bbphy
*
Durant, Robert H. ”
“Checklist for the evaluation of research articles.”
Journal of adolescent health 15, no. 1 (1994): 4-8.
http://tinyurl.com/k8bjuta
*
Van Raan, Anthony FJ, and Th N. Van Leeuwen.
“Assessment of the scientific basis of interdisciplinary, applied research:
application of bibliometric methods in nutrition and food research.”
Research Policy 31, no. 4 (2002): 611-632.
http://tinyurl.com/lo9bzvd
*
Smedley, Brian D., and M. Alfred Haynes, eds.
The unequal burden of cancer: an assessment of NIH research and programs
for ethnic minorities and the medically underserved.
National Academies Press, 1999.
http://tinyurl.com/mttbm86
*
McCann, Russell A., Christina M. Armstrong, Nancy A. Skopp, Amanda Edwards-Stewart,
Derek J. Smolenski, Jennifer D. June, Melinda Metzger-Abamukong, and Greg M. Reger.
“Virtual reality exposure therapy for the treatment of anxiety disorders:
an evaluation of research quality.”
Journal of anxiety disorders 28, no. 6 (2014): 625-631.
http://tinyurl.com/nyet8h3
*
Tijssen, Robert, Martijn Visser, and Thed van Leeuwen.
“Benchmarking international scientific excellence:
Are highly cited research papers an appropriate frame of reference?.”
Scientometrics 54, no. 3 (2002): 381-397.
http://tinyurl.com/mmwrp8n
*
Lawani, Stephen.
“Some bibliometric correlates of quality in scientific research.”
Scientometrics 9, no. 1-2 (1986): 13-25.
http://tinyurl.com/kjkq424
*
Patrick, William J., and Elizabeth C. Stanley.
“Teaching and research quality indicators and the shaping of higher education.”
Research in Higher Education 39, no. 1 (1998): 19-41.
http://tinyurl.com/lqdes8h
*
Allen, Chiharu S., Qi Chen, Victor L. Willson, and Jan N. Hughes.
“Quality of research design moderates effects of grade retention on achievement:
A meta-analytic, multilevel analysis.”
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 31, no. 4 (2009): 480-499.
http://tinyurl.com/l3rh83g
*
Wright, Bradley E., Lepora J. Manigault, and Tamika R. Black.
“Quantitative Research Measurement in Public Administration An Assessment of Journal Publications.”
Administration & Society 35, no. 6 (2004): 747-764.
http://tinyurl.com/kcm6rau
*
Sombatsompop, Narongrit, Teerasak Markpin, Wutthisit Yochai, and M. Saechiew.
“An evaluation of research performance for different subject categories using Impact Factor Point Average (IFPA) index:
Thailand case study.”
Scientometrics 65, no. 3 (2005): 293-305.
http://tinyurl.com/lcef2s3
*
Cho, Mildred K., and Lisa A. Bero.
“Instruments for assessing the quality of drug studies published in the medical literature.”
JAMA 272, no. 2 (1994): 101-104.
http://tinyurl.com/llcwtcw
*
Lee, Frederic S., and Sandra Harley.
“Peer review, the research assessment exercise and the demise of non-mainstream economics.”
Capital and Class 22, no. 3 (1998): 23-51.
http://tinyurl.com/md6fp3b
*
Jefferson, Tom, Melanie Rudin, Suzanne Brodney Folse, and Frank Davidoff.
“Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies.”
The Cochrane Library (2006).
http://tinyurl.com/kl7p2jy
*
Kajermo, Kerstin Nilsson, Gun Nordström, Åsa Krusebrant, and Hjördis Björvell.
“Barriers to and facilitators of research utilization, as perceived
by a group of registered nurses in Sweden.”
Journal of advanced nursing 27, no. 4 (1998): 798-807.
http://tinyurl.com/kjteh7l
*
Groot, Tom, and Teresa Garcia-Valderrama.
“Research quality and efficiency: An analysis of assessments and management issues
in Dutch economics and business research programs.”
Research Policy 35, no. 9 (2006): 1362-1376.
http://tinyurl.com/nxnljjm
*
Boaz, Annette, and Deborah Ashby.
Fit for purpose?: assessing research quality for evidence based policy and practice.
London: ESRC UK Centre for Evidence Based Policy and Practice, 2003.
http://tinyurl.com/lgg83jc
*
Oxman, Andrew D., Gordon H. Guyatt, Joel Singer, Charlie H. Goldsmith, Brian G. Hutchison,
Ruth A. Milner, and David L. Streiner.
“Agreement among reviewers of review articles.”
Journal of clinical epidemiology 44, no. 1 (1991): 91-98.
http://tinyurl.com/ksofwcs
*
Moed, Henk F.
Citation analysis in research evaluation.
Vol. 9. Springer Science & Business Media, 2006.
http://tinyurl.com/le6xsbf
*
Weingart, Peter.
“Impact of bibliometrics upon the science system: Inadvertent consequences?.”
Scientometrics 62, no. 1 (2005): 117-131.
http://tinyurl.com/mqg2gzr
*
Dixon-Woods, Mary, Alex Sutton, Rachel Shaw, Tina Miller, Jonathan Smith,
Bridget Young, Sheila Bonas, Andrew Booth, and David Jones.
“Appraising qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews:
a quantitative and qualitative comparison of three methods.”
Journal of health services research & policy 12, no. 1 (2007): 42-47.
http://tinyurl.com/mw7vgwj
*
Schünemann, Holger J., Andrew D. Oxman, Jan Brozek, Paul Glasziou, Patrick Bossuyt,
Stephanie Chang, Paola Muti, Roman Jaeschke, and Gordon H. Guyatt.
Schünemann, Holger J., Andrew D. Oxman, Jan Brozek, Paul Glasziou, Patrick Bossuyt, Stephanie Chang, Paola Muti, Roman Jaeschke, and Gordon H. Guyatt. “GRADE: assessing the quality of evidence for diagnostic recommendations.” Evidence Based Medicine 13, no. 6 (2008): 162-163.
Evidence Based Medicine 13, no. 6 (2008): 162-163.
http://tinyurl.com/l9nl7b3
*
Brown, Lawrence D., and Ronald J. Huefner.
“The familiarity with and perceived quality of accounting journals:
views of senior accounting faculty in leading US MBA programs.”
Contemporary Accounting Research 11, no. 1 (1994): 223-250.
http://tinyurl.com/mec4sye
*
Seale, Clive.
“Validity, reliability and the quality of research.”
Researching society and culture (2004): 71-83.
http://tinyurl.com/lxg8kwu
*
De Jong, Stefan PL, Pleun Van Arensbergen, Floortje Daemen,
Barend Van Der Meulen, and Peter Van Den Besselaar.
“Evaluation of research in context: an approach and two cases.”
Research Evaluation 20, no. 1 (2011): 61-72.
http://tinyurl.com/kh76kru
*
Tijssen, Robert JW.
“Scoreboards of research excellence.”
Research Evaluation 12, no. 2 (2003): 91-103.
http://tinyurl.com/mja2rno
*
Hammerschlag, R., and M. M. Morris.
“Clinical trials comparing acupuncture with biomedical standard care:
A criteria-based evaluation of research design and reporting.”
Complementary Therapies in Medicine 5, no. 3 (1997): 133-140.
http://tinyurl.com/m85ujud
*
Luukkonen‐Gronow, Terttu.
“Scientific research evaluation: a review of methods and various contexts of their application.”
R&D Management 17, no. 3 (1987): 207-221.
http://tinyurl.com/lz9ofsc
*
Paul, Ray J.
“Measuring research quality: the United Kingdom government’s research assessment exercise.”
European Journal of Information Systems 17, no. 4 (2008): 324-329.
http://tinyurl.com/lp7dmkj
*
Sanz-Menéndez, Luis.
“Research actors and the state: research evaluation
and evaluation of science and technology policies in Spain.”
Research Evaluation 5, no. 1 (1995): 79-88.
http://tinyurl.com/lt8lfzf
*
Parsons, Nicholas R., Richard Hiskens, Charlotte L. Price, Juul Achten, and Matthew L. Costa.
“A systematic survey of the quality of research reporting in general orthopaedic journals.”
J Bone Joint Surg Br 93, no. 9 (2011): 1154-1159.
http://tinyurl.com/ljj7s8p
*
Gibbons, Michael, and Luke Georghiou.
Evaluation of Research. A Selection of Current Practices.
OECD Publications Service, Sales and Distribution Division,
2, rue Andre-Pascal, 75775 Paris, France., 1987.
http://tinyurl.com/kjkjysk
*
Cagan, Ross.
“The San Francisco declaration on research assessment.”
(2013): 869-870.
http://tinyurl.com/mbhhcks
*
Hammersley, Martyn.
“The issue of quality in qualitative research.”
International Journal of Research & Method in Education 30, no. 3 (2007): 287-305.
http://tinyurl.com/lwkjdsq
*
Boaden, Ruth J., and Jan J. Cilliers.
“Quality and the research assessment exercise: just one aspect of performance?.”
Quality Assurance in Education 9, no. 1 (2001): 5-13.
http://tinyurl.com/l8zqnkb
*
Bornmann, Lutz.
“What is societal impact of research and how can it be assessed? A literature survey.”
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 64, no. 2 (2013): 217-233.
http://tinyurl.com/kd548mn
*
Bero, Lisa A., and Drummond Rennie.
“Influences on the quality of published drug studies.”
International journal of technology assessment in health care
12, no. 02 (1996): 209-237.
http://tinyurl.com/l5rvfvt
*
Westerheijden, Don F., Bjorn Stensaker, and Maria João Rosa, eds.
Quality assurance in higher education: Trends in regulation, translation and transformation.
Vol. 20. Springer Science & Business Media, 2007.
http://tinyurl.com/kdd8q69
*
Goh, C. H., C. W. Holsapple, L. E. Johnson, and J. Tanner.
“An empirical assessment of influences on POM research.”
Omega 24, no. 3 (1996): 337-345.
http://tinyurl.com/n8rjjwv
*
Langfeldt, Liv.
“Expert panels evaluating research: decision-making and sources of bias.”
Research Evaluation 13, no. 1 (2004).
http://tinyurl.com/lltatb6
*
Merenstein, Joel, Goutham Rao, and Frank D Amico.
“Clinical research in family medicine: quantity and quality of published articles.”
FAMILY MEDICINE-KANSAS CITY- 35, no. 4 (2003): 284-288.
http://tinyurl.com/kzoox54
*
Bessant, John, Sue Birley, Cary Cooper, Sandra Dawson, John Gennard, Maureen Gardiner, Andrew Gray et al.
“The state of the field in UK management research: reflections of the Research Assessment Exercise (RAE) Panel.”
British Journal of Management 14, no. 1 (2003): 51-68.
http://tinyurl.com/l3wlyhx
*
Franceschet, Massimo, and Antonio Costantini.
“The effect of scholar collaboration on impact and quality of academic papers.”
Journal of informetrics 4, no. 4 (2010): 540-553.
http://tinyurl.com/lue78ey
*
Jensen, Jason L., and Robert Rodgers.
“Cumulating the intellectual gold of case study research.”
Public Administration Review 61, no. 2 (2001): 235-246.
http://tinyurl.com/n96y38d
*
Donovan, Claire, and Linda Butler.
“Testing novel quantitative indicators of research’quality’, esteem and’user engagement’:
an economics pilot study.”
Research Evaluation 16, no. 4 (2007).
http://tinyurl.com/n7gs6hu
*
Brophy, Robert H., Michael J. Gardner, Omar Saleem, and Robert G. Marx.
“An assessment of the methodological quality of research published in The American Journal of Sports Medicine.”
The American journal of sports medicine 33, no. 12 (2005): 1812-1815.
http://tinyurl.com/m5etzep
*
Bence, Valerie, and Charles Oppenheim.
“The evolution of the UK’s Research Assessment Exercise: publications, performance and perceptions.”
Journal of Educational Administration and History 37, no. 2 (2005): 137-155.
http://tinyurl.com/kq7k37c
*
Bence, Valerie, and Charles Oppenheim.
“The influence of peer review on the research assessment exercise.”
Journal of Information Science 30, no. 4 (2004): 347-368.
http://tinyurl.com/mrk7zan
*
Bence, Valerie, and Charles Oppenheim.
“The role of academic journal publications in the UK Research Assessment Exercise.”
Learned Publishing 17, no. 1 (2004): 53-68.
http://tinyurl.com/mszd2rh
*
Ha, Tam Cam, Say Beng Tan, and Khee Chee Soo.
“The journal impact factor: too much of an impact?.”
Annals-Academy Of Medicine Singapore 35, no. 12 (2006): 911.
http://tinyurl.com/m7fnbyg
*
Shaw, Ian, and Matthew Norton.
“Kinds and quality of social work research.”
British Journal of Social Work 38, no. 5 (2008): 953-970.
http://tinyurl.com/knr7tnu
*
Sheikh, Aziz.
“Publication ethics and the research assessment exercise:
reflections on the troubled question of authorship.”
Journal of Medical Ethics 26, no. 6 (2000): 422-426.
http://tinyurl.com/mvz2l7q
*
Hammell, Karen Whalley.
“Informing client-centred practice through qualitative inquiry:
Evaluating the quality of qualitative research.”
The British Journal of Occupational Therapy 65, no. 4 (2002): 175-184.
http://tinyurl.com/jwr3tsl
*
Sparkes, Andrew C., and Brett Smith.
“Judging the quality of qualitative inquiry: Criteriology and relativism in action.”
Psychology of sport and exercise 10, no. 5 (2009): 491-497.
http://tinyurl.com/mhy46b2
*
Abramo, Giovanni, and Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo.
“Evaluating research: from informed peer review to bibliometrics.”
Scientometrics 87, no. 3 (2011): 499-514.
http://tinyurl.com/lpqnfnq
*
Patrick, William J., and Elizabeth C. Stanley.
“Assessment of research quality.”
Research in Higher Education 37, no. 1 (1996): 23-42.
http://tinyurl.com/lscc9ev
*
Leitch, Claire M., Frances M. Hill, and Richard T. Harrison.
“The philosophy and practice of interpretivist research in entrepreneurship:
Quality, validation, and trust.”
Organizational Research Methods 13, no. 1 (2010): 67-84.
http://tinyurl.com/kplcukv
*
Bridges, David.
“Research quality assessment in education: impossible science, possible art?.”
British Educational Research Journal 35, no. 4 (2009): 497-517.
http://tinyurl.com/lr5endo
*
Bleakley, C., and Domhnall MacAuley.
“The quality of research in sports journals.”
British journal of sports medicine 36, no. 2 (2002): 124-125.
http://tinyurl.com/lbxnscw
*
Liao, Chien Hsiang.
“How to improve research quality? Examining the impacts of collaboration intensity
and member diversity in collaboration networks.”
Scientometrics 86, no. 3 (2011): 747-761.
http://tinyurl.com/n6vs4u5
*
McAllister, Paul R., Richard C. Anderson, and Francis Narin.
“Comparison of peer and citation assessment of the influence of scientific journals.”
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 31, no. 3 (1980): 147-152.
http://tinyurl.com/n4x34hc
*
Roulston, Kathryn.
“Considering quality in qualitative interviewing.”
Qualitative Research 10, no. 2 (2010): 199-228.
http://tinyurl.com/klpmgnx
*
Reynolds, Joanna, James Kizito, Nkoli Ezumah, Peter Mangesho, Elizabeth Allen, and Clare Chandler.
“Quality assurance of qualitative research: a review of the discourse.”
Health Research Policy and Systems 9, no. 1 (2011): 43.
http://tinyurl.com/mvamyjm
*
Delaney, Anthony, Sean M. Bagshaw, Andre Ferland, Kevin Laupland, Braden Manns, and Christopher Doig.
“The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews:
an independent appraisal.”
Critical care medicine 35, no. 2 (2007): 589-594.
http://tinyurl.com/llgxkgy
*
Gibbs, Graham. ”
“The relationship between quality in research and quality in teaching.”
Quality in Higher Education 1, no. 2 (1995): 147-157.
http://tinyurl.com/ks86h79
*
Jarwal, Som D., Andrew M. Brion, and Maxwell L. King.
“Measuring research quality using the journal impact factor, citations and ‘Ranked Journals’:
blunt instruments or inspired metrics?.”
Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 31, no. 4 (2009): 289-300.
http://tinyurl.com/l8txu8v
*
Cave, Martin.
“The use of performance indicators in higher education: The challenge of the quality movement.”
Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 1997.
http://tinyurl.com/mdwxb4d
*
Goodall, Amanda H.
“Highly cited leaders and the performance of research universities.”
Research Policy 38, no. 7 (2009): 1079-1092.
http://tinyurl.com/mygf8p8
*
Lindsay, Roger, Rosanna Breen, and Alan Jenkins.
“Academic research and teaching quality: the views of undergraduate and postgraduate students.”
Studies in Higher Education 27, no. 3 (2002): 309-327.
http://tinyurl.com/m73n323
*
Li, Feng, Yong Yi, Xiaolong Guo, and Wei Qi.
“Performance evaluation of research universities in Mainland China, Hong Kong and Taiwan:
based on a two-dimensional approach.”
Scientometrics 90, no. 2 (2012): 531-542.
http://tinyurl.com/m3rk2xl
*
Lewison, Grant, Graham Thornicroft, George Szmukler, and Michele Tansella.
“Fair assessment of the merits of psychiatric research.”
The British Journal of Psychiatry 190, no. 4 (2007): 314-318.
http://tinyurl.com/lkwv3os
*
GEISLER, ELIEZER.
“The mires of research evaluation.”
The Scientist 15, no. 10 (2001): 35-35.
http://tinyurl.com/mdfbvu5
*
Crawford, Cindy C., M. T. Huynh, A. Kepple, and W. B. Jonas.
“Systematic assessment of the quality of research studies of conventional and alternative treatment (s)
of primary headache.”
Pain Physician 12, no. 2 (2009): 461-70.
http://tinyurl.com/n2rju9h
*
Funtowicz, Silvio O., and Jerome R. Ravetz.
“Science for the post-normal age.”
Futures 25, no. 7 (1993): 739-755.
http://tinyurl.com/l6g6vzt
*
*
DATABASE SEARCH RESULTS
*
*
(“RESEARCH REPORTS” OR “JOURNAL ARTICLES” OR “RESEARCH STUDIES”) AND
(“evaluating sources” OR “source evaluation” OR “critical assessment”) AND
(“PEER REVIEWED” OR “EVIDENCE BASED” OR QUALITY OR QUANTITATIVE OR
QUALITATIVE OR ACCURACY OR VALIDITY)
*
*
Google Books
http://tinyurl.com/mv5ox49
*
Google Scholar
http://tinyurl.com/mgl94k3
*
Google Images
http://tinyurl.com/m4jrz5w
*
Google Domain Limited Web Search (IMAGES)
http://tinyurl.com/nyyenkd
*
Google News
http://tinyurl.com/kkye5bo
*
Google Domain Limited Web Search (NEWS)
http://tinyurl.com/m2xxem3
*
Google Domain Limited Web Search (BLOGS)
http://tinyurl.com/luymf6w
*
Google Domain Limited Web Search (VIDEOS)
http://tinyurl.com/l6jzwxv
*
YouTube
http://tinyurl.com/m4dv3g6
*
Google Domain Limited Web Search (PUBMED)
http://tinyurl.com/klpfrlu
*
Google Domain Limited Web Search (SCIENCEDIRECT)
http://tinyurl.com/mqmfsqk
*
Google Domain Limited Web Search (JSTOR)
http://tinyurl.com/k9k7dqw
*
Google Domain Limited Web Search (NCJRS)
http://tinyurl.com/n2p5erv
*
Google Domain Limited Web Search (GOV)
http://tinyurl.com/lz9mnzg
*
Google Domain Limited Web Search (ORG)
http://tinyurl.com/m6tzkam
*
Google Domain Limited Web Search (ERIC/EDU)
http://tinyurl.com/lw86wee
*
Penn State Summon Search
http://tinyurl.com/kxpdnex
- Archival Material (2) Include Exclude
- Book / eBook (31,683) Include Exclude
- Book Chapter (1,097) Include Exclude
- Book Review (706) Include Exclude
- Conference Proceeding (99) Include Exclude
- Data Set (1) Include Exclude
- Dissertation/Thesis (1,399) Include Exclude
- Electronic Resource (3) Include Exclude
- Government Document (32) Include Exclude
- Journal / eJournal (1) Include Exclude
- Journal Article (12,495) Include Exclude
- Magazine Article (62) Include Exclude
- Market Research (2) Include Exclude
- Newsletter (12) Include Exclude
- Newspaper Article (148) Include Exclude
- Paper (8) Include Exclude
- Publication (3) Include Exclude
- Reference (125) Include Exclude
- Report (7) Include Exclude
- Research Guide (681) Include Exclude
- Trade Publication Article (30) Include Exclude
- Transcript (3) Include Exclude
- Web Resource (6) Include Exclude
*
Purdue Primo Search FROM Ex Libris/Alma
http://tinyurl.com/n2486nt
8,501 for Everything
*
.
.
WEBBIB1617
http://tinyurl.com/gtdzaq3
.
.
.
.
How to Write a Research Paper
http://guides.temple.edu/research-papers
.
How to Write an Annotated Bibliography
http://guides.temple.edu/annotated-bibliographies
.
How to Find and Write Book Reviews:
Databases and Search Engine Searches for Finding Book Reviews
http://guides.temple.edu/bkrev
.
Digital Humanities and Digital Initiatives Sources
http://guides.temple.edu/digital-humanities
.
DISSERTATIONS: Finding and Writing Dissertations and Theses
http://guides.temple.edu/dissertations
.
Faculty Credentialing
http://guides.temple.edu/FacultyCredentialing
.
GOVERNMENT PUBLICATION MANUALS :
Government Writing Manuals Guides and Handbooks
http://guides.temple.edu/GovWritingManuals
.
Grey Literature Sources and Tools
http://guides.temple.edu/grey-literature
.
INFORMATION LITERACY AND FRIENDS
http://tinyurl.com/78a4shn
.
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT GUIDE SERIES:
COPYRIGHT, Intellectual Property and Plagiarism Sources
http://guides.temple.edu/copyright-plagiarism
.
Fair Use Under Copyright Law:
Fair Use Books, Websites and Database Search Results
http://guides.temple.edu/fair-use
.
JOURNAL CITATION RANKING SUBJECT LISTS FEATURING SCIMAGO:
Citation Analysis, Journal Rankings and Rankings Within Disciplines
and Faculty Assessment and Credentialing
http://guides.temple.edu/journal-citation-ranking
.
How to Create a Literature Review
http://guides.temple.edu/literature-review
.
Media Literacy and News Literacy
http://guides.temple.edu/medialit
.
How to Create a Meta-Analysis and a Systematic Review
http://guides.temple.edu/Meta-Analysis
.
NEWS: Newspapers News and News Archive Resources
http://guides.temple.edu/news
.
Plain English Writing Books and Database Search Results
http://guides.temple.edu/plain-english
.
REFWORKS
http://guides.temple.edu/ref-works
STATISTICS:
Databases, Sources and Database Search Results
for Statisitical Data Compilations and Publications
Including an Extensive Section of United States
Government Agencies with Database Search Results
from Nineteen Database Search Links for Each Agency
http://guides.temple.edu/statistics-sources
.
Research Guide Directory : Discussion Group Directory
https://sites.google.com/site/researchguidesonsites/
.
.
[PDF] Evaluating Sources of Information
PK Hurley – Online Text and Course Materials – Citeseer
http://tinyurl.com/gvt7qfy
.
Articles
Writing Centers and Libraries: One-Stop Shopping for Better Term Papers
DOI:10.1080/02763870802101310
Rachel Cookea* & Carol Bledsoeb
pages 119-127
Published online: 12 Dec 2008
The Reference Librarian
Volume 49, Issue 2, 2008
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02763870802101310
http://tinyurl.com/zvakyqj
.
MacDonald, A. B.
(2010).
Multiple Visions of the Research Paper:
How Compositionists and Librarians Understand, Represent, and Teach
the Research Process
(Doctoral dissertation, Auburn University).
https://etd.auburn.edu/handle/10415/2072
.
Donahue, A. E., and Gamtso, C.
(2010).
Term papers, Google, and library anxiety:
how can information literacy improve students’ research skills?.
http://tinyurl.com/hxtbz99
.
DATABASE SEARCH RESULTS: Penn State Summon Search
http://tinyurl.com/ltnjzzv
(“term paper” OR “term papers” OR “research paper” OR “research papers”)
AND (“source evaluation” OR “evaluating sources”)
2,774 results
Source Types
- Book / eBook (1,960) Include Exclude
- Book Chapter (32) Include Exclude
- Book Review (21) Include Exclude
- Conference Proceeding (5) Include Exclude
- Dissertation/Thesis (52) Include Exclude
- Government Document (3) Include Exclude
- Journal Article (335) Include Exclude
- Magazine Article (7) Include Exclude
- Newsletter (2) Include Exclude
- Newspaper Article (15) Include Exclude
- Poster (1) Include Exclude
- Reference (23) Include Exclude
- Report (1) Include Exclude
- Research Guide (347) Include Exclude
- Trade Publication Article (2) Include Exclude
- Web Resource (3) Include Exclude
Content Sample
MLA handbook for writers of research papers
byGibaldi, Joseph
1999, 5th ed.
Book: Stacks – General Collection, LB2369.M165 1999, Penn State Beaver (+8 More)
MLA handbook for writers of research papers
byGibaldi, Joseph
2009, 7th ed.
The MLA Handbook is published by the Modern Language Association, the authority
on MLA documentation style. Widely adopted in high schools, colleges, and…
The elements of library research: what every student needs to know
byGeorge, Mary W
2008
To do solid academic research, college students need to look beyond the computer search engine.
This short, practical book introduces students to the important…
10 steps in writing the research paper
byMarkman, Roberta H; Markman, Peter T; Waddell, Marie L
1989, 4th ed.
The Little, Brown guide to writing research papers
byMeyer, Michael
1985, 2nd ed.
Writing Centers and Libraries: One-Stop Shopping for Better Term Papers
byCooke, Rachel; Bledsoe, Carol
The Reference Librarian, 09/2008, Volume 49, Issue 2
Beyond Consultation: A New Model for Librarian’s Office Hours
byAvery, Susan; Hahn, Jim; Zilic, Melissa
Public Services Quarterly, 09/2008, Volume 4, Issue 3
Writing a research paper: students explain their process
byDubicki, Eleonora
Reference Services Review, 11/2015, Volume 43, Issue 4
Writing research papers: a complete guide
byLester, James D., Sr; Lester, James D., Jr
2012, 14th ed.
.
.
.
The Critical Assessment of Research:
Traditional and New Methods of Evaluation
Chandos information professional series
Authors Alan Bailin, Ann Grafstein
Publisher Chandos, 2010
Original from University of Chicago
Digitized Apr 18, 2011
ISBN 1843345439, 9781843345435
Length 121 pages
http://tinyurl.com/m74fl6k
*
Educational Research:
Why ‘What Works’ Doesn’t Work
Volume 1 of Educational Research
Editors Paul Smeyers, Marc Depaepe
Edition illustrated, reprint
Publisher
Springer Science & Business Media, 2007
ISBN 1402053088, 9781402053085
Length 196 pages
http://tinyurl.com/kgwclsu
*
Managing Quality in Qualitative Research
Qualitative Research Kit
Author Uwe Flick
Edition reprint
Publisher SAGE, 2008
ISBN 144620524X, 9781446205242
Length 160 pages
http://tinyurl.com/kg85uyf
*
A Bird’s-Eye View of Assessment:
Selections from Editor’s Notes
Volume 10 of Assessment Update Special Collections
Editor Trudy W. Banta
Publisher John Wiley & Sons, 2011
ISBN 1118109155, 9781118109151
Length 96 pages
http://tinyurl.com/myjgj99
*
“evaluation of research” OR “evaluating research” OR “research evaluation” OR (assessment AND “quality of research”)
*
Handbook of Family Literacy
Editor Barbara Hanna Wasik
Edition illustrated, reprint
Publisher Routledge, 2012
ISBN 0415884578, 9780415884570
Length 479 pages
http://tinyurl.com/mlk74z3
*
Organizations and Strategies in Astronomy, Volume 3
Volume 256; Volume 266; Volume 280; Volume 296;
Volume 310 of Astrophysics and Space Science Library :
a series of books on the recent developments of space
science and of general geophysics and astrophysics
Astrophysics and Space Science Library, ISSN 0067-0057
Organizations and Strategies in Astronomy, André Heck
Editor Andre Heck
Edition illustrated
Publisher Springer Science & Business Media, 2002
ISBN 1402008120, 9781402008122
Length 238 pages
http://tinyurl.com/kkmyzgu
*
Library Assessment in Higher Education
Author Joseph R. Matthews
Publisher Greenwood Publishing Group, 2007
ISBN 031309487X, 9780313094873
Length 146 pages
http://tinyurl.com/kbnjx8e
*
Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research:
The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems
Editors Henk F. Moed, Wolfgang Glänzel, Ulrich Schmoch
Edition illustrated
Publisher Springer Science & Business Media, 2004
ISBN 1402027028, 9781402027024
Length 800 pages
http://tinyurl.com/kx88d3b
*
Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation
Volume 9 of Information Science and Knowledge Management
Author Henk F. Moed
Edition illustrated
Publisher Springer Science & Business Media, 2006
ISBN 1402037147, 9781402037146
Length 348 pages
http://tinyurl.com/n69g48t
*
Evidence-Based Prevention
Prevention Practice Kit
Editors Katherine Raczynski,
Michael Waldo, Jonathan P. Schwartz,
Arthur M. Horne
Publisher SAGE Publications, 2012
ISBN 1483307654, 9781483307657
Length 96 pages
http://tinyurl.com/kgebcj3
*
The SAGE Handbook of Social Work Research
Sage Handbooks
Author Ian Shaw
Edition illustrated
Publisher SAGE Publications, 2009
ISBN 1412934982, 9781412934985
Length 572 pages
http://tinyurl.com/mtw92na
*
An Introduction to Qualitative Research
Author Uwe Flick
Publisher SAGE, 2009
ISBN 1446241319, 9781446241318
Length 528 pages
http://tinyurl.com/k86gu87
*
Issues in Discovery, Experimental,
and Laboratory Medicine:
2011 Edition
Contributor Q. Ashton Acton, PhD
Publisher ScholarlyEditions, 2012
ISBN 1464963509, 9781464963506
Length 3453 pages
http://tinyurl.com/n8rg9cx
*
The Quality of Qualitative Research
Introducing Qualitative Methods series
Author Clive Seale
Publisher SAGE, 1999
ISBN 144627621X, 9781446276211
Length 224 pages
http://tinyurl.com/k66e3ug
*
How to Do Research: A Psychologist’s Guide
Author Jonathan St. B. T. Evans
Edition illustrated
Publisher Taylor & Francis, 2005
ISBN 1841695424, 9781841695426
Length 126 pages
http://tinyurl.com/kmwftds
*
Braskamp, Larry A., and John C. Ory.
Assessing Faculty Work: Enhancing Individual and Institutional Performance.
Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. Jossey-Bass Inc.,
350 Sansome Street, San Francisco, CA 94104, 1994.
http://tinyurl.com/ln4pwf7
*
Armijo‐Olivo, Susan, Carla R. Stiles, Neil A. Hagen, Patricia D. Biondo, and Greta G. Cummings.
“Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews:
a comparison of the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool
and the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool: methodological research.”
Journal of evaluation in clinical practice 18, no. 1 (2012): 12-18.
http://tinyurl.com/krpalg8
*
Hall, C. Michael.
“Publish and perish?
Bibliometric analysis, journal ranking and the assessment of research quality in tourism.”
Tourism Management 32, no. 1 (2011): 16-27.
http://tinyurl.com/khoawg8
*
Muldoon, Matthew F., Steven D. Barger, Janine D. Flory, and Stephen B. Manuck.
“What are quality of life measurements measuring?.”
BMJ: British Medical Journal 316, no. 7130 (1998): 542.
http://tinyurl.com/l2dzlxk
*
Glasziou, Paul, Jan Vandenbroucke, and Iain Chalmers. ”
Assessing the quality of research.”
BMJ: British Medical Journal 328, no. 7430 (2004): 39.
http://tinyurl.com/ldbfqfq
*
Lee, Kirby P., Marieka Schotland, Peter Bacchetti, and Lisa A. Bero.
“Association of journal quality indicators with methodological quality of clinical research articles.”
JAMA 287, no. 21 (2002): 2805-2808.
http://tinyurl.com/lqnux5m
*
Weiskopf, Nicole Gray, and Chunhua Weng.
“Methods and dimensions of electronic health record data quality assessment:
enabling reuse for clinical research.”
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 20, no. 1 (2013): 144-151.
http://tinyurl.com/llozgtu
*
Shea, Beverley J., Candyce Hamel, George A. Wells, Lex M. Bouter, Elizabeth Kristjansson,
Jeremy Grimshaw, David A. Henry, and Maarten Boers.
“AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool
to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews.”
Journal of clinical epidemiology 62, no. 10 (2009): 1013-1020.
http://tinyurl.com/lhp97rl
*
Akkerman, Sanne, Wilfried Admiraal, Mieke Brekelmans, and Heinze Oost.
“Auditing quality of research in social sciences.”
Quality & Quantity 42, no. 2 (2008): 257-274.
http://tinyurl.com/l8svcgb
*
Cheek, Julianne, Bridget Garnham, and James Quan.
“What’s in a number? Issues in providing evidence of impact and quality of research (ers).”
Qualitative Health Research 16, no. 3 (2006): 423-435.
http://tinyurl.com/kfugm4k
*
Oxman, Andrew D., and Gordon H. Guyatt.
“Validation of an index of the quality of review articles.”
Journal of clinical epidemiology 44, no. 11 (1991): 1271-1278.
http://tinyurl.com/lde5upj
*
Rapley, Mark.
Quality of life research: A critical introduction.
Sage, 2003.
http://tinyurl.com/lowuk2u
*
Campos-Outcalt, Douglas, Janet Senf, Arleen J. Watkins, and Stan Bastacky.
“The effects of medical school curricula, faculty role models, and biomedical research support
on choice of generalist physician careers: a review and quality assessment of the literature.”
Academic Medicine 70, no. 7 (1995): 611-9.
http://tinyurl.com/mhtlpsh
*
Tan, David L.
“The assessment of quality in higher education: A critical review of the literature and research.”
Research in higher education 24, no. 3 (1986): 223-265.
http://tinyurl.com/khhooz7
*
Taylor, Jim.
“The assessment of research quality in UK universities: Peer review or metrics?.”
British Journal of Management 22, no. 2 (2011): 202-217.
http://tinyurl.com/mjnzjvr
*
Roberts, Sir Gareth.
Review of research assessment.
London: RA Review, 2003.
http://tinyurl.com/lhj9ca7
*
Chase, Richard B.
“A classification and evaluation of research in operations management.”
Journal of Operations Management 1, no. 1 (1980): 9-14.
http://tinyurl.com/lq4uoyl
*
Seale, Clive.
“Quality in qualitative research.”
Qualitative inquiry 5, no. 4 (1999): 465-478.
http://tinyurl.com/ljb2bn8
*
Smith, Richard.
“Measuring the social impact of research: difficult but necessary.”
BMJ: British Medical Journal 323, no. 7312 (2001): 528.
http://tinyurl.com/mzo9ywl
*
Lombard, Matthew, Jennifer Snyder‐Duch, and Cheryl Campanella Bracken.
“Content analysis in mass communication: Assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability.”
Human communication research 28, no. 4 (2002): 587-604.
http://tinyurl.com/my4u7r4
*
Valentine, Jeffrey C., and Harris Cooper.
“A systematic and transparent approach for assessing
the methodological quality of intervention effectiveness research:
the Study Design and Implementation Assessment Device (Study DIAD).”
Psychological methods 13, no. 2 (2008): 130.
http://tinyurl.com/n32wa7z
*
Furlong, John, and Alis Oancea.
“Assessing quality in applied and practice-based educational research: A framework for discussion.”
Review of Australian research in education: counterpoints on the quality and impact of educational research––
a special issue of the Australian Educational Researcher 6 (2005): 89-104.
http://tinyurl.com/n95xsp5
*
Lexchin, Joel, Lisa A. Bero, Benjamin Djulbegovic, and Otavio Clark.
“Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic review.”
Bmj 326, no. 7400 (2003): 1167-1170.
http://tinyurl.com/kedqmfh
*
Dusenbury, Linda, Rosalind Brannigan, Mathea Falco, and William B. Hansen.
“A review of research on fidelity of implementation:
implications for drug abuse prevention in school settings.”
Health education research 18, no. 2 (2003): 237-256.
http://tinyurl.com/lyhzc7j
*
Chalmers, Iain, and Paul Glasziou.
“Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence.”
Obstetrics & Gynecology 114, no. 6 (2009): 1341-1345.
http://tinyurl.com/lztseuj
*
Geuna, Aldo, and Ben R. Martin.
“University research evaluation and funding: An international comparison.”
Minerva 41, no. 4 (2003): 277-304.
http://tinyurl.com/k38oj7e
*
Olivo, Susan Armijo, Luciana Gazzi Macedo, Inae Caroline Gadotti, Jorge Fuentes,
Tasha Stanton, and David J. Magee.
“Scales to assess the quality of randomized controlled trials: a systematic review.”
Physical therapy 88, no. 2 (2008): 156.
http://tinyurl.com/lpmtukc
*
Schmoch, Ulrich, and Torben Schubert.
“Are international co-publications an indicator for quality of scientific research?.”
Scientometrics 74, no. 3 (2007): 361-377.
http://tinyurl.com/lay8ovw
*
Tooth, Leigh, Robert Ware, Chris Bain, David M. Purdie, and Annette Dobson.
“Quality of reporting of observational longitudinal research.”
American Journal of Epidemiology 161, no. 3 (2005): 280-288.
http://tinyurl.com/ljr9ryn
*
Sanderson, Simon, Iain D. Tatt, and Julian PT Higgins.
“Tools for assessing quality and susceptibility to bias in observational studies in epidemiology:
a systematic review and annotated bibliography.”
International journal of epidemiology 36, no. 3 (2007): 666-676.
http://tinyurl.com/my9aelz
*
Barker, Katharine.
“The UK Research Assessment Exercise:
the evolution of a national research evaluation system.”
Research Evaluation 16, no. 1 (2007): 3-12.
http://tinyurl.com/m4fudjo
*
Elton, Lewis.
“The UK research assessment exercise: unintended consequences.”
Higher Education Quarterly 54, no. 3 (2000): 274-283.
http://tinyurl.com/llg9b4d
*
Moed, Henk F.
“The future of research evaluation
rests with an intelligent combination of advanced metrics and transparent peer review.”
Science and Public Policy (SPP) 34, no. 8 (2007).
http://tinyurl.com/mez3f3k
*
Staniszewska, Sophie, Jo Brett, Carole Mockford, and Rosemary Barber.
“The GRIPP checklist: strengthening the quality of patient and public involvement reporting in research.”
International journal of technology assessment in health care 27, no. 04 (2011): 391-399.
http://tinyurl.com/kvfgb6s
*
Popay, Jennie, Anne Rogers, and Gareth Williams.
“Rationale and standards for the systematic review of qualitative literature in health services research.”
Qualitative health research 8, no. 3 (1998): 341-351.
http://tinyurl.com/lvfn6la
*
Ivanitskaya, Lana, Irene O. Boyle, and Anne Marie Casey.
“Health information literacy and competencies of information age students:
results from the interactive online Research Readiness Self-Assessment (RRSA).”
Journal of Medical Internet Research 8, no. 2 (2006): e6.
http://tinyurl.com/mlk49yz
*
Hanney, Stephen R., Miguel A. Gonzalez-Block, Martin J. Buxton, and Maurice Kogan.
“The utilisation of health research in policy-making:
concepts, examples and methods of assessment.”
Health research policy and systems 1, no. 1 (2003): 2.
http://tinyurl.com/lhgoqcb
*
Northcott, Deryl, and Simon Linacre.
“Producing spaces for academic discourse:
The impact of research assessment exercises and journal quality rankings.”
Australian Accounting Review 20, no. 1 (2010): 38-54.
http://tinyurl.com/k2yc4bd
*
Gough, David.
“Weight of evidence: a framework for the appraisal of the quality and relevance of evidence.”
Research papers in education 22, no. 2 (2007): 213-228.
http://tinyurl.com/lukmru9
*
Lee, Frederic S.
“The Research Assessment Exercise,
the state and the dominance of mainstream economics in British universities.”
Cambridge Journal of Economics 31, no. 2 (2007): 309-325.
http://tinyurl.com/n4b5zx2
*
Besley, Tina.
Assessing the quality of educational research in higher education: International perspectives.
Sense Publishers, 2009.
http://tinyurl.com/l928brh
*
Wortman, Paul M.
“Judging research quality.”
The handbook of research synthesis (1994): 97-109.
http://tinyurl.com/kql7sxp
*
Foster, Peter.
“‘Never mind the quality, feel the impact’: a methodological assessment of teacher research
sponsored by the Teacher Training Agency.”
British Journal of Educational Studies 47, no. 4 (1999): 380-398.
http://tinyurl.com/ljxb9cn
*
Doyle, J. R., and A. J. Arthurs.
“Judging the quality of research in business schools: The UK as a case study.”
Omega 23, no. 3 (1995): 257-270.
http://tinyurl.com/kpr4bog
*
Barnett-Page, Elaine, and James Thomas.
“Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review.”
BMC medical research methodology 9, no. 1 (2009): 59.
http://tinyurl.com/khfht5o
*
Vaughn, John.
“Accreditation, commercial rankings, and new approaches
to assessing the quality of university research and education programmes in the United States.”
Higher Education in Europe 27, no. 4 (2002): 433-441.
http://tinyurl.com/jwqk4su
*
Adams, Guy B., and Jay D. White.
“Dissertation research in public administration and cognate fields:
An assessment of methods and quality.”
Public Administration Review (1994): 565-576.
http://tinyurl.com/mzlv28p
*
Emerson, John D., Elisabeth Burdick, David C. Hoaglin, Frederick Mosteller, and Thomas C. Chalmers.
“An empirical study of the possible relation of treatment differences to quality scores
in controlled randomized clinical trials.”
Controlled clinical trials 11, no. 5 (1990): 339-352.
http://tinyurl.com/lkqpg6d
*
Korhonen, Pekka, Risto Tainio, and Jyrki Wallenius.
“Value efficiency analysis of academic research.”
European Journal of Operational Research 130, no. 1 (2001): 121-132.
http://tinyurl.com/l2tfjct
*
Al-Benna, Sammy, Durayd Alzoubaidi, and Yazan Al-Ajam.
“Evidence-based burn care—an assessment of the methodological quality of research published
in burn care journals from 1982 to 2008.”
Burns 36, no. 8 (2010): 1190-1195.
http://tinyurl.com/kfaj7ae
*
Tashakkori, Abbas, and Charles Teddlie.
“Quality of inferences in mixed methods research: Calling for an integrative framework.”
Advances in mixed methods research (2008): 101-119.
http://tinyurl.com/lfyox7r
*
Hicks, Diana.
“Evolving regimes of multi-university research evaluation.”
Higher Education 57, no. 4 (2009): 393-404.
http://tinyurl.com/mg2sj62
*
Jin, Bihui, and Ronald Rousseau.
“Evaluation of research performance and scientometric indicators in China.”
In Handbook of quantitative science and technology research,
pp. 497-514. Springer Netherlands, 2004.
http://tinyurl.com/lfogbcs
*
Tomlinson, Stephan.
“The research assessment exercise and medical research.”
British Medical Journal 320, no. 7235 (2000): 636.
http://tinyurl.com/lrmvxyp
*
Burla, Laila, Birte Knierim, Jurgen Barth, Katharina Liewald, Margreet Duetz, and Thomas Abel.
“From text to codings: intercoder reliability assessment in qualitative content analysis.”
Nursing research 57, no. 2 (2008): 113-117.
http://tinyurl.com/mqbcnna
*
Orton, Lois, Ffion Lloyd-Williams, David Taylor-Robinson, Martin O’Flaherty, and Simon Capewell.
“The use of research evidence in public health decision making processes: systematic review.”
PloS one 6, no. 7 (2011): e21704.
http://tinyurl.com/la6m9vs
*
Hemingway, Harry, Peter Philipson, Ruoling Chen, Natalie K. Fitzpatrick, Jacqueline Damant,
Martin Shipley, Keith R. Abrams et al.
“Evaluating the quality of research into a single prognostic biomarker:
a systematic review and meta-analysis of 83 studies of C-reactive protein
in stable coronary artery disease.”
PLoS Med 7, no. 6 (2010): e1000286.
http://tinyurl.com/l5ujavb
*
Van der Meulen, Barend, and Arie Rip.
“Evaluation of societal quality of public sector research in the Netherlands.”
Research Evaluation 9, no. 1 (2000): 11-25.
http://tinyurl.com/k2s2ojw
*
Howley, Lisa, Karen Szauter, Linda Perkowski, Maurice Clifton, and Nancy McNaughton.
“Quality of standardised patient research reports in the medical education literature:
review and recommendations.”
Medical education 42, no. 4 (2008): 350-358.
http://tinyurl.com/leoafrg
*
Oppenheim, Charles.
“The correlation between citation counts and the 1992 research assessment exercise ratings
for British research in genetics, anatomy and archaeology.”
Journal of documentation 53, no. 5 (1997): 477-487.
http://tinyurl.com/k8xjzuw
*
Long, Andrew F., and Mary Godfrey.
“An evaluation tool to assess the quality of qualitative research studies.”
International Journal of Social Research Methodology 7, no. 2 (2004): 181-196.
http://tinyurl.com/lrbs4em
*
Rey-Rocha, Jesús, M. José Martín-Sempere, Jesús Martínez-Frías, and Fernando López-Vera.
“Some misuses of journal impact factor in research evaluation.”
Cortex 37, no. 4 (2001): 595-597.
http://tinyurl.com/l84zeka
*
Falchikov, Nancy, and David Boud.
“Student self-assessment in higher education: A meta-analysis.”
Review of Educational Research 59, no. 4 (1989): 395-430.
http://tinyurl.com/mem5rkh
*
Lundh, Andreas, and Peter C. Gøtzsche.
“Recommendations by Cochrane Review Groups for assessment of the risk of bias in studies.”
BMC medical research methodology 8, no. 1 (2008): 22.
http://tinyurl.com/m8bbphy
*
Durant, Robert H. ”
“Checklist for the evaluation of research articles.”
Journal of adolescent health 15, no. 1 (1994): 4-8.
http://tinyurl.com/k8bjuta
*
Van Raan, Anthony FJ, and Th N. Van Leeuwen.
“Assessment of the scientific basis of interdisciplinary, applied research:
application of bibliometric methods in nutrition and food research.”
Research Policy 31, no. 4 (2002): 611-632.
http://tinyurl.com/lo9bzvd
*
Smedley, Brian D., and M. Alfred Haynes, eds.
The unequal burden of cancer: an assessment of NIH research and programs
for ethnic minorities and the medically underserved.
National Academies Press, 1999.
http://tinyurl.com/mttbm86
*
McCann, Russell A., Christina M. Armstrong, Nancy A. Skopp, Amanda Edwards-Stewart,
Derek J. Smolenski, Jennifer D. June, Melinda Metzger-Abamukong, and Greg M. Reger.
“Virtual reality exposure therapy for the treatment of anxiety disorders:
an evaluation of research quality.”
Journal of anxiety disorders 28, no. 6 (2014): 625-631.
http://tinyurl.com/nyet8h3
*
Tijssen, Robert, Martijn Visser, and Thed van Leeuwen.
“Benchmarking international scientific excellence:
Are highly cited research papers an appropriate frame of reference?.”
Scientometrics 54, no. 3 (2002): 381-397.
http://tinyurl.com/mmwrp8n
*
Lawani, Stephen.
“Some bibliometric correlates of quality in scientific research.”
Scientometrics 9, no. 1-2 (1986): 13-25.
http://tinyurl.com/kjkq424
*
Patrick, William J., and Elizabeth C. Stanley.
“Teaching and research quality indicators and the shaping of higher education.”
Research in Higher Education 39, no. 1 (1998): 19-41.
http://tinyurl.com/lqdes8h
*
Allen, Chiharu S., Qi Chen, Victor L. Willson, and Jan N. Hughes.
“Quality of research design moderates effects of grade retention on achievement:
A meta-analytic, multilevel analysis.”
Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis 31, no. 4 (2009): 480-499.
http://tinyurl.com/l3rh83g
*
Wright, Bradley E., Lepora J. Manigault, and Tamika R. Black.
“Quantitative Research Measurement in Public Administration An Assessment of Journal Publications.”
Administration & Society 35, no. 6 (2004): 747-764.
http://tinyurl.com/kcm6rau
*
Sombatsompop, Narongrit, Teerasak Markpin, Wutthisit Yochai, and M. Saechiew.
“An evaluation of research performance for different subject categories using Impact Factor Point Average (IFPA) index:
Thailand case study.”
Scientometrics 65, no. 3 (2005): 293-305.
http://tinyurl.com/lcef2s3
*
Cho, Mildred K., and Lisa A. Bero.
“Instruments for assessing the quality of drug studies published in the medical literature.”
JAMA 272, no. 2 (1994): 101-104.
http://tinyurl.com/llcwtcw
*
Lee, Frederic S., and Sandra Harley.
“Peer review, the research assessment exercise and the demise of non-mainstream economics.”
Capital and Class 22, no. 3 (1998): 23-51.
http://tinyurl.com/md6fp3b
*
Jefferson, Tom, Melanie Rudin, Suzanne Brodney Folse, and Frank Davidoff.
“Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies.”
The Cochrane Library (2006).
http://tinyurl.com/kl7p2jy
*
Kajermo, Kerstin Nilsson, Gun Nordström, Åsa Krusebrant, and Hjördis Björvell.
“Barriers to and facilitators of research utilization, as perceived
by a group of registered nurses in Sweden.”
Journal of advanced nursing 27, no. 4 (1998): 798-807.
http://tinyurl.com/kjteh7l
*
Groot, Tom, and Teresa Garcia-Valderrama.
“Research quality and efficiency: An analysis of assessments and management issues
in Dutch economics and business research programs.”
Research Policy 35, no. 9 (2006): 1362-1376.
http://tinyurl.com/nxnljjm
*
Boaz, Annette, and Deborah Ashby.
Fit for purpose?: assessing research quality for evidence based policy and practice.
London: ESRC UK Centre for Evidence Based Policy and Practice, 2003.
http://tinyurl.com/lgg83jc
*
Oxman, Andrew D., Gordon H. Guyatt, Joel Singer, Charlie H. Goldsmith, Brian G. Hutchison,
Ruth A. Milner, and David L. Streiner.
“Agreement among reviewers of review articles.”
Journal of clinical epidemiology 44, no. 1 (1991): 91-98.
http://tinyurl.com/ksofwcs
*
Moed, Henk F.
Citation analysis in research evaluation.
Vol. 9. Springer Science & Business Media, 2006.
http://tinyurl.com/le6xsbf
*
Weingart, Peter.
“Impact of bibliometrics upon the science system: Inadvertent consequences?.”
Scientometrics 62, no. 1 (2005): 117-131.
http://tinyurl.com/mqg2gzr
*
Dixon-Woods, Mary, Alex Sutton, Rachel Shaw, Tina Miller, Jonathan Smith,
Bridget Young, Sheila Bonas, Andrew Booth, and David Jones.
“Appraising qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews:
a quantitative and qualitative comparison of three methods.”
Journal of health services research & policy 12, no. 1 (2007): 42-47.
http://tinyurl.com/mw7vgwj
*
Schünemann, Holger J., Andrew D. Oxman, Jan Brozek, Paul Glasziou, Patrick Bossuyt,
Stephanie Chang, Paola Muti, Roman Jaeschke, and Gordon H. Guyatt.
Schünemann, Holger J., Andrew D. Oxman, Jan Brozek, Paul Glasziou, Patrick Bossuyt, Stephanie Chang, Paola Muti, Roman Jaeschke, and Gordon H. Guyatt. “GRADE: assessing the quality of evidence for diagnostic recommendations.” Evidence Based Medicine 13, no. 6 (2008): 162-163.
Evidence Based Medicine 13, no. 6 (2008): 162-163.
http://tinyurl.com/l9nl7b3
*
Brown, Lawrence D., and Ronald J. Huefner.
“The familiarity with and perceived quality of accounting journals:
views of senior accounting faculty in leading US MBA programs.”
Contemporary Accounting Research 11, no. 1 (1994): 223-250.
http://tinyurl.com/mec4sye
*
Seale, Clive.
“Validity, reliability and the quality of research.”
Researching society and culture (2004): 71-83.
http://tinyurl.com/lxg8kwu
*
De Jong, Stefan PL, Pleun Van Arensbergen, Floortje Daemen,
Barend Van Der Meulen, and Peter Van Den Besselaar.
“Evaluation of research in context: an approach and two cases.”
Research Evaluation 20, no. 1 (2011): 61-72.
http://tinyurl.com/kh76kru
*
Tijssen, Robert JW.
“Scoreboards of research excellence.”
Research Evaluation 12, no. 2 (2003): 91-103.
http://tinyurl.com/mja2rno
*
Hammerschlag, R., and M. M. Morris.
“Clinical trials comparing acupuncture with biomedical standard care:
A criteria-based evaluation of research design and reporting.”
Complementary Therapies in Medicine 5, no. 3 (1997): 133-140.
http://tinyurl.com/m85ujud
*
Luukkonen‐Gronow, Terttu.
“Scientific research evaluation: a review of methods and various contexts of their application.”
R&D Management 17, no. 3 (1987): 207-221.
http://tinyurl.com/lz9ofsc
*
Paul, Ray J.
“Measuring research quality: the United Kingdom government’s research assessment exercise.”
European Journal of Information Systems 17, no. 4 (2008): 324-329.
http://tinyurl.com/lp7dmkj
*
Sanz-Menéndez, Luis.
“Research actors and the state: research evaluation
and evaluation of science and technology policies in Spain.”
Research Evaluation 5, no. 1 (1995): 79-88.
http://tinyurl.com/lt8lfzf
*
Parsons, Nicholas R., Richard Hiskens, Charlotte L. Price, Juul Achten, and Matthew L. Costa.
“A systematic survey of the quality of research reporting in general orthopaedic journals.”
J Bone Joint Surg Br 93, no. 9 (2011): 1154-1159.
http://tinyurl.com/ljj7s8p
*
Gibbons, Michael, and Luke Georghiou.
Evaluation of Research. A Selection of Current Practices.
OECD Publications Service, Sales and Distribution Division,
2, rue Andre-Pascal, 75775 Paris, France., 1987.
http://tinyurl.com/kjkjysk
*
Cagan, Ross.
“The San Francisco declaration on research assessment.”
(2013): 869-870.
http://tinyurl.com/mbhhcks
*
Hammersley, Martyn.
“The issue of quality in qualitative research.”
International Journal of Research & Method in Education 30, no. 3 (2007): 287-305.
http://tinyurl.com/lwkjdsq
*
Boaden, Ruth J., and Jan J. Cilliers.
“Quality and the research assessment exercise: just one aspect of performance?.”
Quality Assurance in Education 9, no. 1 (2001): 5-13.
http://tinyurl.com/l8zqnkb
*
Bornmann, Lutz.
“What is societal impact of research and how can it be assessed? A literature survey.”
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 64, no. 2 (2013): 217-233.
http://tinyurl.com/kd548mn
*
Bero, Lisa A., and Drummond Rennie.
“Influences on the quality of published drug studies.”
International journal of technology assessment in health care
12, no. 02 (1996): 209-237.
http://tinyurl.com/l5rvfvt
*
Westerheijden, Don F., Bjorn Stensaker, and Maria João Rosa, eds.
Quality assurance in higher education: Trends in regulation, translation and transformation.
Vol. 20. Springer Science & Business Media, 2007.
http://tinyurl.com/kdd8q69
*
Goh, C. H., C. W. Holsapple, L. E. Johnson, and J. Tanner.
“An empirical assessment of influences on POM research.”
Omega 24, no. 3 (1996): 337-345.
http://tinyurl.com/n8rjjwv
*
Langfeldt, Liv.
“Expert panels evaluating research: decision-making and sources of bias.”
Research Evaluation 13, no. 1 (2004).
http://tinyurl.com/lltatb6
*
Merenstein, Joel, Goutham Rao, and Frank D Amico.
“Clinical research in family medicine: quantity and quality of published articles.”
FAMILY MEDICINE-KANSAS CITY- 35, no. 4 (2003): 284-288.
http://tinyurl.com/kzoox54
*
Bessant, John, Sue Birley, Cary Cooper, Sandra Dawson, John Gennard, Maureen Gardiner, Andrew Gray et al.
“The state of the field in UK management research: reflections of the Research Assessment Exercise (RAE) Panel.”
British Journal of Management 14, no. 1 (2003): 51-68.
http://tinyurl.com/l3wlyhx
*
Franceschet, Massimo, and Antonio Costantini.
“The effect of scholar collaboration on impact and quality of academic papers.”
Journal of informetrics 4, no. 4 (2010): 540-553.
http://tinyurl.com/lue78ey
*
Jensen, Jason L., and Robert Rodgers.
“Cumulating the intellectual gold of case study research.”
Public Administration Review 61, no. 2 (2001): 235-246.
http://tinyurl.com/n96y38d
*
Donovan, Claire, and Linda Butler.
“Testing novel quantitative indicators of research’quality’, esteem and’user engagement’:
an economics pilot study.”
Research Evaluation 16, no. 4 (2007).
http://tinyurl.com/n7gs6hu
*
Brophy, Robert H., Michael J. Gardner, Omar Saleem, and Robert G. Marx.
“An assessment of the methodological quality of research published in The American Journal of Sports Medicine.”
The American journal of sports medicine 33, no. 12 (2005): 1812-1815.
http://tinyurl.com/m5etzep
*
Bence, Valerie, and Charles Oppenheim.
“The evolution of the UK’s Research Assessment Exercise: publications, performance and perceptions.”
Journal of Educational Administration and History 37, no. 2 (2005): 137-155.
http://tinyurl.com/kq7k37c
*
Bence, Valerie, and Charles Oppenheim.
“The influence of peer review on the research assessment exercise.”
Journal of Information Science 30, no. 4 (2004): 347-368.
http://tinyurl.com/mrk7zan
*
Bence, Valerie, and Charles Oppenheim.
“The role of academic journal publications in the UK Research Assessment Exercise.”
Learned Publishing 17, no. 1 (2004): 53-68.
http://tinyurl.com/mszd2rh
*
Ha, Tam Cam, Say Beng Tan, and Khee Chee Soo.
“The journal impact factor: too much of an impact?.”
Annals-Academy Of Medicine Singapore 35, no. 12 (2006): 911.
http://tinyurl.com/m7fnbyg
*
Shaw, Ian, and Matthew Norton.
“Kinds and quality of social work research.”
British Journal of Social Work 38, no. 5 (2008): 953-970.
http://tinyurl.com/knr7tnu
*
Sheikh, Aziz.
“Publication ethics and the research assessment exercise:
reflections on the troubled question of authorship.”
Journal of Medical Ethics 26, no. 6 (2000): 422-426.
http://tinyurl.com/mvz2l7q
*
Hammell, Karen Whalley.
“Informing client-centred practice through qualitative inquiry:
Evaluating the quality of qualitative research.”
The British Journal of Occupational Therapy 65, no. 4 (2002): 175-184.
http://tinyurl.com/jwr3tsl
*
Sparkes, Andrew C., and Brett Smith.
“Judging the quality of qualitative inquiry: Criteriology and relativism in action.”
Psychology of sport and exercise 10, no. 5 (2009): 491-497.
http://tinyurl.com/mhy46b2
*
Abramo, Giovanni, and Ciriaco Andrea D’Angelo.
“Evaluating research: from informed peer review to bibliometrics.”
Scientometrics 87, no. 3 (2011): 499-514.
http://tinyurl.com/lpqnfnq
*
Patrick, William J., and Elizabeth C. Stanley.
“Assessment of research quality.”
Research in Higher Education 37, no. 1 (1996): 23-42.
http://tinyurl.com/lscc9ev
*
Leitch, Claire M., Frances M. Hill, and Richard T. Harrison.
“The philosophy and practice of interpretivist research in entrepreneurship:
Quality, validation, and trust.”
Organizational Research Methods 13, no. 1 (2010): 67-84.
http://tinyurl.com/kplcukv
*
Bridges, David.
“Research quality assessment in education: impossible science, possible art?.”
British Educational Research Journal 35, no. 4 (2009): 497-517.
http://tinyurl.com/lr5endo
*
Bleakley, C., and Domhnall MacAuley.
“The quality of research in sports journals.”
British journal of sports medicine 36, no. 2 (2002): 124-125.
http://tinyurl.com/lbxnscw
*
Liao, Chien Hsiang.
“How to improve research quality? Examining the impacts of collaboration intensity
and member diversity in collaboration networks.”
Scientometrics 86, no. 3 (2011): 747-761.
http://tinyurl.com/n6vs4u5
*
McAllister, Paul R., Richard C. Anderson, and Francis Narin.
“Comparison of peer and citation assessment of the influence of scientific journals.”
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 31, no. 3 (1980): 147-152.
http://tinyurl.com/n4x34hc
*
Roulston, Kathryn.
“Considering quality in qualitative interviewing.”
Qualitative Research 10, no. 2 (2010): 199-228.
http://tinyurl.com/klpmgnx
*
Reynolds, Joanna, James Kizito, Nkoli Ezumah, Peter Mangesho, Elizabeth Allen, and Clare Chandler.
“Quality assurance of qualitative research: a review of the discourse.”
Health Research Policy and Systems 9, no. 1 (2011): 43.
http://tinyurl.com/mvamyjm
*
Delaney, Anthony, Sean M. Bagshaw, Andre Ferland, Kevin Laupland, Braden Manns, and Christopher Doig.
“The quality of reports of critical care meta-analyses in the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews:
an independent appraisal.”
Critical care medicine 35, no. 2 (2007): 589-594.
http://tinyurl.com/llgxkgy
*
Gibbs, Graham. ”
“The relationship between quality in research and quality in teaching.”
Quality in Higher Education 1, no. 2 (1995): 147-157.
http://tinyurl.com/ks86h79
*
Jarwal, Som D., Andrew M. Brion, and Maxwell L. King.
“Measuring research quality using the journal impact factor, citations and ‘Ranked Journals’:
blunt instruments or inspired metrics?.”
Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management 31, no. 4 (2009): 289-300.
http://tinyurl.com/l8txu8v
*
Cave, Martin.
“The use of performance indicators in higher education: The challenge of the quality movement.”
Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 1997.
http://tinyurl.com/mdwxb4d
*
Goodall, Amanda H.
“Highly cited leaders and the performance of research universities.”
Research Policy 38, no. 7 (2009): 1079-1092.
http://tinyurl.com/mygf8p8
*
Lindsay, Roger, Rosanna Breen, and Alan Jenkins.
“Academic research and teaching quality: the views of undergraduate and postgraduate students.”
Studies in Higher Education 27, no. 3 (2002): 309-327.
http://tinyurl.com/m73n323
*
Li, Feng, Yong Yi, Xiaolong Guo, and Wei Qi.
“Performance evaluation of research universities in Mainland China, Hong Kong and Taiwan:
based on a two-dimensional approach.”
Scientometrics 90, no. 2 (2012): 531-542.
http://tinyurl.com/m3rk2xl
*
Lewison, Grant, Graham Thornicroft, George Szmukler, and Michele Tansella.
“Fair assessment of the merits of psychiatric research.”
The British Journal of Psychiatry 190, no. 4 (2007): 314-318.
http://tinyurl.com/lkwv3os
*
GEISLER, ELIEZER.
“The mires of research evaluation.”
The Scientist 15, no. 10 (2001): 35-35.
http://tinyurl.com/mdfbvu5
*
Crawford, Cindy C., M. T. Huynh, A. Kepple, and W. B. Jonas.
“Systematic assessment of the quality of research studies of conventional and alternative treatment (s)
of primary headache.”
Pain Physician 12, no. 2 (2009): 461-70.
http://tinyurl.com/n2rju9h
*
Funtowicz, Silvio O., and Jerome R. Ravetz.
“Science for the post-normal age.”
Futures 25, no. 7 (1993): 739-755.
http://tinyurl.com/l6g6vzt
*
*
DATABASE SEARCH RESULTS
*
*
(“RESEARCH REPORTS” OR “JOURNAL ARTICLES” OR “RESEARCH STUDIES”) AND
(“evaluating sources” OR “source evaluation” OR “critical assessment”) AND
(“PEER REVIEWED” OR “EVIDENCE BASED” OR QUALITY OR QUANTITATIVE OR
QUALITATIVE OR ACCURACY OR VALIDITY)
*
*
Google Books
http://tinyurl.com/mv5ox49
*
Google Scholar
http://tinyurl.com/mgl94k3
*
Google Images
http://tinyurl.com/m4jrz5w
*
Google Domain Limited Web Search (IMAGES)
http://tinyurl.com/nyyenkd
*
Google News
http://tinyurl.com/kkye5bo
*
Google Domain Limited Web Search (NEWS)
http://tinyurl.com/m2xxem3
*
Google Domain Limited Web Search (BLOGS)
http://tinyurl.com/luymf6w
*
Google Domain Limited Web Search (VIDEOS)
http://tinyurl.com/l6jzwxv
*
YouTube
http://tinyurl.com/m4dv3g6
*
Google Domain Limited Web Search (PUBMED)
http://tinyurl.com/klpfrlu
*
Google Domain Limited Web Search (SCIENCEDIRECT)
http://tinyurl.com/mqmfsqk
*
Google Domain Limited Web Search (JSTOR)
http://tinyurl.com/k9k7dqw
*
Google Domain Limited Web Search (NCJRS)
http://tinyurl.com/n2p5erv
*
Google Domain Limited Web Search (GOV)
http://tinyurl.com/lz9mnzg
*
Google Domain Limited Web Search (ORG)
http://tinyurl.com/m6tzkam
*
Google Domain Limited Web Search (ERIC/EDU)
http://tinyurl.com/lw86wee
*
Penn State Summon Search
http://tinyurl.com/kxpdnex
- Archival Material (2) Include Exclude
- Book / eBook (31,683) Include Exclude
- Book Chapter (1,097) Include Exclude
- Book Review (706) Include Exclude
- Conference Proceeding (99) Include Exclude
- Data Set (1) Include Exclude
- Dissertation/Thesis (1,399) Include Exclude
- Electronic Resource (3) Include Exclude
- Government Document (32) Include Exclude
- Journal / eJournal (1) Include Exclude
- Journal Article (12,495) Include Exclude
- Magazine Article (62) Include Exclude
- Market Research (2) Include Exclude
- Newsletter (12) Include Exclude
- Newspaper Article (148) Include Exclude
- Paper (8) Include Exclude
- Publication (3) Include Exclude
- Reference (125) Include Exclude
- Report (7) Include Exclude
- Research Guide (681) Include Exclude
- Trade Publication Article (30) Include Exclude
- Transcript (3) Include Exclude
- Web Resource (6) Include Exclude
*
Purdue Primo Search FROM Ex Libris/Alma
http://tinyurl.com/n2486nt
8,501 for Everything
*
.
.
.
WEBBIB1718
http://tinyurl.com/y8j5gj6m
.
.
Sincerely,
David Dillard
Temple University
(215) 204 – 4584
jwne@…
http://workface.com/e/daviddillard
NET-GOLD
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/net-gold
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/net-gold.html
https://groups.io/org/groupsio/net-gold/archives
Research Guides
https://sites.google.com/site/researchguidesonsites/
Research Paper Writing
https://sites.google.com/site/howtowriteasuperresearchpaper/
Employment
https://sites.google.com/site/employmentsources/
Internships
https://sites.google.com/site/internshipsarticles/
Blog
https://educatorgold.wordpress.com/
Twitter: davidpdillard
Sport-Med
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/sport-med.html
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/sport-med.html
https://groups.io/g/SportMed/topics
.
Sincerely,
David Dillard
Temple University
(215) 204 – 4584
jwne@…
http://workface.com/e/daviddillard
NET-GOLD
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/net-gold
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/net-gold.html
https://groups.io/org/groupsio/net-gold/archives
Research Guides
https://sites.google.com/site/researchguidesonsites/
Research Paper Writing
https://sites.google.com/site/howtowriteasuperresearchpaper/
Employment
https://sites.google.com/site/employmentsources/
Internships
https://sites.google.com/site/internshipsarticles/
Blog
https://educatorgold.wordpress.com/
Twitter: davidpdillard
Sport-Med
https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/sport-med.html
http://listserv.temple.edu/archives/sport-med.html
https://groups.io/g/SportMed/topics
|